OK, great! Maybe they can also help you to remove the obsolete relations.

OK, I see your recent uploads contain the normal comments.
I can't help with id because I never use it. I only work with JOSM. I'll contact an expert for bus routes, maybe he can help.

Sorry, can't help with that. Is it a fork of the standard id editor? I wonder why it doesn't produce any changeset comments. This is uncommon and should be changed.

Bus relations are very difficult to map. What editor do you use?

Hi! You created some empty route relations during the last days. Do you plan to fill them later?
relation/11109193
relation/11109192
relation/11109183
relation/11109182
relation/11109185
relation/11109184
relation/11109187
relation/11109186
relation/11109189
relation/11109188
relation/11109191
relation/11109190

Hi!. You removed all the members of this route relation. relation/2083896
Was that intended?

Hi! Please review. I see lots of ways tagged with building="yes," instead of building="yes"
All have the tag mapwithai:source=MapWithAI

Hi! Please review. I see lots of ways tagged with building="yes," instead of building="yes"
All have the tag mapwithai:source=MapWithAI

Wow, this was a rather bad import.
You probably didn't follow the rules given here:
osm.wiki/Import
I see that you already fixed some of the
nodes during the last weeks.
This one is still bad:
node/7278416985

Da sind noch zwei weitere Relationen gelöscht worden. Wahrscheinlich auch unabsichtlich?

Moin! Ist das Absicht, dass die Wendeschleife teil der multipolygon Relation ist? Macht so keinen Sinn.

Hi! Please check: You created an empty connectivity relation
relation/10189992

Yes, seems so. The problem was in version 2 and it was fixed in version 3

Are you asking me?

OK, thanks for the info. I agree that both the uphill part as well as the downhill part are too steep, wouldn't be much fun for me. Maybe you can add smoothness?

I wonder if I can travel this path with a trekking bike (downhill).
I looked at the pictures for mtb:scale=2
mtb:scale=*#mtb:scale.3D0-6
and the wiki for surface=paving_stones says "A relatively smooth surface ..."

Hi!
You added surface=paving_stones and mtb:scale:uphill=4 to this path. Looks wrong to me, probably this way is not paved at all?

Moin!
Ich versuche gerade zu verstehen, warum hier eine unzusammenhängende Sammlung von Wegen als type=multipolygon erfasst ist.
Kann diese Relation gelöscht werden?

Ich bin nur zufällig drauf gestoßen, weil ich für Tests nach "kaputten" MP gesucht habe.
Bin da nicht heimisch und die Luftbilder zeigen verschiedene "Löcher" in den Wäldern...

Moin!
Ich staune gerade über einige MP mit nur einem Member, z.B. relation/7360211 oder relation/7367873
War wohl keine Absicht, oder?