OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
36721131 almost 10 years ago

Hi there!
Please review
highway=s on
way/254070869
I am not a local. It looks like a highway=residential to me.
Is it really a oneway=yes ?

36728937 almost 10 years ago

Hi there!
I've fixed a typo
highway=un
here:
way/31933521
Please check the south end of this way. I wonder why you kept the small parts as highway=tertiary ?

36693954 almost 10 years ago

Hi there!
Please check the tags on this way:
way/392246138
addr:street=Держинского улица
highway=г. Костюковичи
I think addr:street should be changed to name=* , highway is residential,
but I have no idea what "г. Костюковичи" means.
BTW: You use a very old version of JOSM, is that intended? See
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/WikiStart

36694062 almost 10 years ago

Moin!
Habe einen
highway=Unterbastorf
gefunden. War da is_in:city oder so was gemeint?
way/392393201

36671030 almost 10 years ago

Thanks, looks better now.

36647900 almost 10 years ago

Hi there!
You changed a road to highway=yes here.
This tag value "yes" is deprecated, the road looks like a track.
See
way/17098084

36671030 almost 10 years ago

Hi there!
highway=weighbridge is rarely used, please use
amenity=weighbridge
instead.I also guess that there is a way around that weighbridge ?

36689030 almost 10 years ago

Hi there!
You use the tag highway=was:residential here. This is only used here.
I think highway=dismantled matches better, if those roads ever existed. Another option would be was:highway=residential
Better don't use highway for something that isn't a highway.

36679318 almost 10 years ago

Hi there!
What do you try to map here? A junction=roundabout should be a circular way, see
junction=roundabout

36665243 almost 10 years ago

Hi there!
I've just fixed a typo highway=constraction
here:
way/340179924
I think adding access=no is not helpful here:
1) the way still has bicycle=designated which overides the general access=no
2) the way leads to nowhere, means, it is not connected to other highways, so there is no need to bother about routing issues ;-)

36650823 almost 10 years ago

Hi there!
Please check this typo:
You changed highway=unclassified to highway=TER :
way/390193920
I've reverted that for now.

36640284 almost 10 years ago

sounds good to me. I am not eager to change them as they are probably not evaluated by any routing software.

36640284 almost 10 years ago

My experience is that mechanical edits are so "banned" that I stiopped thinking about them :-(
Besides that there are probably not only maxspeed signs, I think some are also tagged with traffic_sign=*.

36640284 almost 10 years ago

Thanks for the feedback. I just noticed that the number of nodes tagged highway=traffic_sign increased during the last days, so I thought I'd better contact you. I did not try to find out who changed the ~1000 older nodes.

36263254 almost 10 years ago

If the area is for walking I suggest to use highway=footway(or maybe pedestrian) + area=yes. I would not remove the other ways then.

36640284 almost 10 years ago

Hi there!
Please review:
Maxspeed traffic signs are mapped with
traffic_sign=maxspeed + maxspeed=*
You used highway=traffic_sign + maxspeed=*
which is rather unusual

36631741 almost 10 years ago

Hi there!
Please check this typo:
highway=t on node
node/3951444857
What was meant ?

36627623 almost 10 years ago

Hi there!
Please explain: What is meant by
highway=theoretical ?

36612092 almost 10 years ago

Please check again:
I don't see the footway=crossing tag
on the ways.

36624756 almost 10 years ago

Hi there and welcome to OSM!
You have mapped a way with
highway=line here, I guess that was a typo?
See
way/391813719