OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
21491317 about 10 years ago

kein Problem, ich lösche den Weg einfach

12041086 about 10 years ago

I guess you wanted to change the name of the way, but did you also want to change the type to highway=motorway?

12041086 about 10 years ago

Hi Alois,
thanks for the feedback.
Please looks at this node:
node/27305535
which is part of this way:
way/174494001

13301842 about 10 years ago

Hi there!
You have used the tag highway=snow_path
for 4 ways, e.g.
way/183478110

This tag is not used anywhere else. My understanding
is that
highway=path
ice_road=yes
might be better here?
See also
ice_road=*

32505366 about 10 years ago

Hi there!
I've noticed the rarely used tag highway=snowmobile
on
way/359423451
and
way/230222252

Do these two ways have no "normal"
purpose? I would expect something like
highway=path (or track)
snowmobile=designated (or yes)
See also
snowmobile=*

35582360 about 10 years ago

Hi there!
I've noticed the way
way/382773314
What did you try to map here?
The attribute ighway=crossing should be used
to mark nodes where pedestrians can cross a highway.
The area enclosed by the way is already mapped as landuse=residential
way/205342327
So I think these two tags should be removed.

25592812 about 10 years ago

Hi John!
What was meant with this way?
way/304466474
Is it still needed?

33768468 about 10 years ago

Hi there!
I've noticed that you've removed most ways tagged with highway=tour.
Just one remained:
way/368900732

29918421 about 10 years ago

Hi there!
I've noticed that you've mapped a gap
in the "Township Road" with tho nodes
highway=washout.
If this gap still exists:
Is this a kind of ford ? Or just erosion ?
And is the road still used ?

35196943 about 10 years ago

Hi there!
I've changed tow nodes with
highway=guidepost to
tourism=information,information=guidepost
node/3826983775
node/3826191662
See information=guidepost
OK?

35535742 about 10 years ago

hi there!
I've noticed that you used
highway=secondary_junction
instead of motorway_junction.
I've corrected this, see
changeset/35588296
and
highway=motorway_junction

35570779 about 10 years ago

Hallo Uli,
siehe http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Why-is-ford-yes-not-rendered-in-the-default-style-tt5861038.html
Ich bleib dran ...
ciao,
Gerd

35559903 about 10 years ago

Hi there!
I've changed the rarely used highway=gate to barrier=gate.
node/3857553257

35536396 about 10 years ago

Hi there!
I've changed the rarely used highway=gate to barrier=gate.
See
barrier=*

35276733 about 10 years ago

I've tried to correct it, see
changeset/35587799
OK?

35570779 about 10 years ago

Vergiss es, ich habe es jetzt selber gesehen,
dass highway=ford auf osm.org
ein Symbol bekommt, ford=yes aber nicht.
Werde mal nachfragen, warum das so ist.

35570779 about 10 years ago

Hi ulil,
ich sehe, dass Du immer noch highway=ford
anstelle von ford=yes verwendest. Kannst Du nochmal genauer erklären, wo die Darstellung von highway=ford "funtioniert" und die von ford=yes nicht?

22168155 about 10 years ago

Thanks for the feedback.
I suggest to add a corresponding note to the bridge element:
way/71830177

35463360 about 10 years ago

Hi there!
Please check, I've changed footpath to footway:
way/381474113

35557429 about 10 years ago

Hi there!
I've change a wrong highway tag and some other small problems, see
changeset/35579173