please review relation/3959384:
the tag highway=lwn looks like a typo.
What is meant here?
relation/3959384

okay thanks

ich wünschte, die Unterscheidung zwischen residential und unclassified wäre einfacher.
Ich verwende (in Westeuropa) dort, wo eine Strasse zwei verschiedene "residential areas" verbindet. Keine Ahnung, ob die paar Häuser am Ende des Weges zu Untergiem gehören oder nicht ;-)

Thanks for the info. I've changed the highway tag to a comment

please review
way/12068267

Bing shows a nice way close to it.
Was that build after you tagged it
highway=x-residential or is Bing out-dated now?

alles klar, habe ein bisschen Lametta drangehängt.
way/377959070

okay, here is my change:
changeset/35030445

Hallo Marcus,

es geht zwar nur um einen Radweg, aber
die Erfindung einens neuen Tags wie highway=temporarily_blocked
ist nicht nötig. Ich schlage
note="construction is progress"
oder so ähnlich vor, falls es überhaupt sinnvoll ist, kurzfristige Bauarbeiten zu mappen. Siehe auch
osm.wiki/DE:Key:construction

please review: I guess highway=sres meant
highway=residential?
I've changed it to that.
way/377835619

please review way/377847156
I've changed highway=alley to
highway=service
service=alley
changeset/35028416

please review the invalid
tag highway="Cap del Barry"
Not sure what you wanted to change here.
way/161463048

please review: I've changed the invalid tag
highway=residential;unclassified to
highway=unclassified
way/164027708

please review:
the tag highway=track;unclassified
is invalid. Most of the way looks like a highway=track, but those are typically not named. On the other hand, the name
"Chemin du Côteau" appeas also on another way, see way/95853944 and
way/377869093

please review way/57778765:
due to an error in iD you were allowed to merge two ways with different attributes:
bicycle=no;designated
foot=yes;designated
highway=path;footway
surface=dirt;compacted
width=1;2
Please try to fix these invalid tags.
way/57778765

okay, 1st floor means level=1
those road attributes shoud not be added to the node. I see that this happens quite often in this area. If you are looking for a good example:
I think node/3810912268
looks much better.
I don't understand the tag
node_id=*
which is also often used in this area.
The node id is a property of the node in the OSM database, there should be no need to add it as a tag.

great, thanks for the quick reaction

done, next time I just change and post a link
to the changesetto let you know, okay?

please review:
you added a few nodes with "highway=traffic_signals " (trailing blank!)
I've combined them to one in the middle, see changeset/35021571
and
highway=traffic_signals

please review:
is it okay to replace highway=bus_stop_inactive
by disused:highway=bus_stop ?
It is only used in this changeset, see e.g.
node/31112788

please review: is it okay to change
highway=ex_bus_stop to
abandoned:highway=bus_stop ?
The tag is only used 3 times, e.g. here
node/393422352