please review:
way/254490127 has the tag
highway=construction;trunk_link
It is not clear what this should say.

please check: the tag highway=consultation
is not used by any other mapper and data
consumers might misinterpret it as an existing highway. What do you think about
highway=proposed in combination with a note or a special tag that gives details about the planning stage?
See also
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/how-to-tag-a-quot-highway-quot-that-doesn-t-exist-tt5857111.html

please review:
the tag highway=zaorane is invalid.
Was it meant to be name=zaorane?

bitte prüfen:
was bedeutet highway=boundary
auf Knoten ?
www.openstreetmap.org/node/3189694671

please review uncommon tag
highway=boundary
on way/323478442

please review:
I've changed
www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/338651621
from highway=undefined to highway=service
Maybe it is also a living_street?
Besides that the current satellite pictures show a rather big offset, Mapbox smaller than Bing, but maybe the roads should be moved a bit to the east?

thanks for the feedback. I don't know
"Go Map!" , maybe you can select multiple
elements when you assign a tag?

thanks, and yes, I just wanted to explain why
I did not change the tag on my own.

please review: note/442976

bitte prüfen:
ungültiges tag
highway=footway;platform
and den Wegen
346966668, 346966667, 29400272

please review:
I've removed the invalid tag
"highway": "residential;bus_stop",
from the way. I don't know where the
bus_stop is.

please review:
way/371796574 has invalid tag
highway=unclassified;service
Bing doesn't seem to show current status.
way/371796574

please review:
the tag name=Harselaarseweg
appears on some highway=service
roads.
way/337957201 has invalid tag
highway=service;unclassified

please note:
your change produced an invalid
tag highway=service;unclassified
on way/304312386
way/304312386
I'll change it to highway=unclassified

thanks for both actions :-)

thanks a lot!
Please join the discussion, it is very easy,
and don't worry about your english, it is very good

please review, parts seem to be
highway=construction now?

thanks for the feedback. I try to reduce the number of tags which express some kind
of planning. See also
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/how-to-tag-a-quot-highway-quot-that-doesn-t-exist-tt5857111.html
What about using proposed and add a note reg. the current status?

thanks, I'll paste full links in future comments

please review:
would it be okay to change the tag
highway=prepoposed to the well documented
highway=proposed ?