OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
33069876 over 10 years ago

please review this and many more changesets in this area:
tags with prefix addr: should not be used
for highways, please use the corresponding
tags with prefix is_in:

34631040 over 10 years ago

please review:
I've corrected a wrong tag on way/138410286:
highway=residential;unclassified
to
highway=residential
I've also added some more roads,
maybe you know the names for them?
See changeset/34669313

33462312 over 10 years ago

nicht einverstanden?
Im Moment fehlt der Weg einfach auf der Karte, weil
highway=service;residential
keinen Sinn ergibt.

34449405 over 10 years ago

please review:
way/123158137 (name=Якорный проспект)
has now invalid tag
highway=residential;tertiary
and disappeared from the map

33472589 over 10 years ago

bitte prüfen:
highway=residential;tertiary
ist ungültig.
name=Obersammelsdorf...Lanzendorf
sieht auch seltsam aus.
Evtl. sind alle Strassen mit diesem
Namen highway=tertiary?

32215868 over 10 years ago

I've corrected a few invalid tags like
highway=residential;road

If you are a local, please review
changeset/34668639

25084368 over 10 years ago

please review:
footway=ebankment
is a very unusual tag. Was ist
meant to be embankment=yes ?

20538780 over 10 years ago

please review:
highway=footway
footway=footway
looks wrong. Are these ways only
for pedestrians or also for cyclists?

31477363 over 10 years ago

please review: invalid tags for
way/32269418:
highway=residential;tertiary
surface=paved;unpaved

33052540 over 10 years ago

please review:
way/107885451 has invalid tags
highway=track;residential
surface=earth;cobblestone
Maybe split the way where the surface changes

33230459 over 10 years ago

please review:
way/125098394 (Rua Marfim) doesn't appear on the map
because it has the invalid tag
highway=residential;track

33745204 over 10 years ago

please review:
way/124168720 has invalid tag:
highway=residential;track
Also suspicious:
yh:WIDTH=1.5m〜3.0m;3.0m〜5.5m

31478008 over 10 years ago

please review:
way/43533380 now has invalid tags
highway=residential;track
surface=paved;ground;unpaved

30428681 over 10 years ago

you missed two small pieces

33485481 over 10 years ago

please review:
some ways don't appear on the map because they have the wrong tag
highway=unclassified;track

32816780 over 10 years ago

please review,
way/344892887 now has the invalid tag
highway=unclassified;track

30428681 over 10 years ago

please review:
some ways with
name=Via Paipo
have the invalid tag
highway=unclassified;track

31321180 over 10 years ago

bitte prüfen:
1) way/331106512 hat ungültige tags wie
highway=unclassified;track
surface=asphalt;grass
Bitte evtl. Weg splitten
2) Garmin ist als Quelle Tabu, sofern Du damit nicht aufgezeichnete GPS meinst ;-)

29072358 over 10 years ago

please review:
is it intended that the trunk 4 is
overlapping a highway=residential?
See e.g. way/327821192,way 324503577

32683546 over 10 years ago

sorry, forgot to thank you for that hint reg. Geobase