Hi!
Please review highway="residential;unclassified" on way/191201005
It seems that the app GoMap! creates such wrong data ?

Hi!
I just stumbled over what looks like totally misaligned roads and found this changeset.
See e.g. node/1039759640
or the track starting at node/2524448338
Maybe the sat images changed since your changes? Current layer from Strava seem to say that DigitalGlobe sat images are good, but maybe out-aged.

Hi!
Please review typo highway=hi on way/540588776

I am not sure what you mean. I refered to nodes with e.g. addr:housenumber=ks or KS,
shop=123 or maybe addr:place=a.
This area is full of this data and it is nearly impossible to fix it without local knowledge.

OK, seems that the two alternatives are both accepted. So I've learned something new ;-)

The wiki highway=traffic_signals#Traffic_signals_for_pedestrians says "Add the following tags in addition to highway=traffic_signals for pedestrian crossings if the entire crossing is represented by a single node, or to each highway=crossing nodes if the pedestrian crossings are tagged on their own (strongly recommended). "

This crossing is not represented by a single node.

Hi!
What is meant with highway=погорелова ?
way/101311183

Hi!
Please check highway="carrer de València"
on way/22725910
I assume you wanted to change the name
instead of the highway tag?

One more link:
osm.wiki/Waterways#Man-made_structures

Hi!
I've noticed that you used highway=bridge for a few ways crossing waterways. The usual way is to give the bridge the tag bridge=yes.
Typically you have either a highway=* + bridge=yes + layer=1
or waterway=* + tunnel=culvert + layer=-1
in this situation.
See also bridge=*
and tunnel=*

Hi! Please review typo highway=44 on way/540424568
I assume you meant height=44?

OK, I don't know about the nodes shared with the rails, but the other two are obviously nodes shared by a footway=crossing and a major road, so highway=crossing is the right tag. The tag highway=traffic_signals is only used for simple crossroads of two major roads.

My understanding is that you have a highway=crossing as described in
crossing=*

I think you should have highway=crossing + crossing=traffic_signals instead of
highway=traffic_signals + crossing=traffic_signals

Hi!
I've noticed this change because of the unusual highway=residential_link used here:
way/540261399
Besides that residential_link should not be used I think it is a secondary_link or just hw=residential.

Hi!
I've changed highway=crossing to highway=footway + footway=crossing here:
way/540282359
I've also changed the nodes from highway=traffic_signals to highway=crossing. Please review.

Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this change because of the tag highway=crossing used on a way like here:
way/540054529
This tag is meant to be used on the node shared by the major road and the footway. The footway itself is mapped with highway=footway + footway=crossing.
I did not yet change it because you connected the way with a node that is tagged highway=traffic_signals and I think the footway should not use that node. Please review my changes: changeset/53764132

Moin!
Bitte verwende highway=crossing nur für den Node, den Fußweg und (Haupt-)Straße gemeinsam haben. Der Fußweg selbst wird wie immer mit highway=footway und zusätzlich mit footway=crossing erfaßt.
Im Falle von way/540196303 läuft der Weg auch noch ohne Verbindung über einen Fußweg, vielleicht ist es eine Brücke?
Siehe auch osm.wiki/DE:Key:crossing

Hi!
Please don't use Bing where Japan GSI ortho Imagery is available. Bing is not ortorectified enough.

Hi!
Why did you change highway=residential to highway=Road here?
way/423065465
The previous value highway=residential looks correct to me.