Hi!
This looks like an import to me. Unfortunately the data is not useful for OSM
because you did not tag the nodes or connect them with ways. What was the source for these nodes?
Did you follow osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines ?

Hi!
Please don't add landuse=residential to a building. Maybe use building=residential instead. See
building=residential

Hi!
This looks like an import that went wrong. The changeset added many nodes without any tags or ways. Did you follow the import guidelines?
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

This cs was reverted, see changeset/52813945

Hi!
I've reverted this changeset because it is of no use for OSM and looks like an undiscussed import. See
changeset/52813536

Hi!
I wonder what you tried to map here. The changeset contains 1157 nodes which are of no use as is because they have no tags and they are not connected to a way or relation.
I assume it is an import that did not work.
Did you follow the instructions for imports given here? osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

I think I can see a road on the southern
part. Please check my changes:
changeset/52779157

Hi!
Please review mapping of this footbrige:
way/523066079
The correct tags are highway=footbway + bridge=yes + layer=1
Please add bicycle=yes if appropriate.
See also
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/4309

Hi!
I fixed a typo highway="te]"
on three ways. I assume you meant tertiary, see changeset/52726073

Maybe you need something like access=private here?

Hi and welcome to OSM!
The tag highway=social_path is only used here. If you want to express that nobody is allowed to use a path the tag access=no is enough. If you want to express that there is no path at all you can use was:highway=path or maybe historic:highway=path

Hi and welcome to OSM!
Why did you revert my correction?
The correct tag is highway="residential"
not highway="highway=residential"
way/530095171

Hi!
What is meant with highway=aerial on this way?
way/12507485
I think the last part is part of the driveway,
the middle looks like a hw=track and the first part might be a hw=path.

If you execute the overpass query you'll find a few ways which are still tagged with highway=crossing. This tag is only meant for nodes.

Ok, maybe also interesting for you:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/4309

Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this change because of the unusual tag highway=stairs instead of steps.
I corrected that already, see
way/530043278
Is this way really still named Isolotto?
way/328132609

Hi!
Please review:
You changed a lot of ways with highway=footway + footway=crossing to
highway=crossing. See
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/s9s
I assume this was not intended as highway=crossing should only be used to tag the shared node of the footway and the major road.
See highway=crossing
Please correct the data.

Ok, im Prinzip verwenden wir die gleiche Methoden. Ich frage mich aber, ob es nicht eher am Untergrund liegt, ob man die Fahrspuren gut sieht oder nicht. Ich habe halt lanes=1 verwendet, weil 2 der default für unclassified ist.
Ich habe aber nichts dagegen, wenn Du die von mir geänderten Wege nochmal änderst.

Danke für die Hinweise.
Woran erkenne ich bei Bing die besseren Wege? ImPrinzip scheint es hier je einen mehr oder weniger direkten Weg zwischen den einzelnen Häusern zu geben.
Die meisten buildings sind laut Bing okay,
bei den Straßen gibt / gab es halt jede Menge unverbundene Stückchen.
Wegen lanes: Gilt das für ganz Afrika?

Hi!
Please review way/443988643
and
way/443990679
You created some ways with multiple highway values like highway=service;footway or
highway=service;living_street
It seems that this is a common problem in the Go Map! App, so please watch out!