Hi!
Please review typo lanes="RD QUE-13"
on way/376621156
Looks like a ref. What about the highway=tertiary at both ends?

Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've notice that you add addr:city=MACHALA
to several roads. Please note that the spelling is Machala. Besides that this tag is not needed for objects inside this boundary relation:
relation/2670341
I suggest to remove the wrong tag from all objects. I can do this for you.

Moin!
Schau mal bitte auf lanes=forward=2;backward=1
an way/27032770
Sollte wohl lanes=3 sowie
lanes:forward und lanes:backward sein?
Ist das nur an diesem Stück so? Ich kann's auf den Sat-Bildern nicht erkennen

Bin gerade wieder drüber gestolpert. Soll ich es ändern?

Hi!
Please review unusual tag highway=service_link near this circular way that looks like a junction=roundabout
way/470898893
See also junction=roundabout

Hi mahamoud,

I see that you are one of the active mappers in this area. Unfortunately you don't use tags like building=yes or maybe barrier=wall. You've also added lots of duplicated information in the past, for example these two ways
way/340478694
way/353653343
You use JOSM, so I wonder if you know that you first have to download the existing data before you start to add new data.
Please let me know if I can help.

Hi!
I wonder why you have mapped Parc del Nord
with so many different types.
I think it Is a leisure=park, not a landuse=village_green. For sure it cannot be both.
I would remove the highway attribute and access tags like bicycle=yes from this way.
Please review also way/458675604
which is an unclosed way with area=yes.

Hi!
I wonder if you meant landuse=residential
way/440589729
and
way/440589722

I've tried to correct them, see
changeset/51804262

Hi!
Please review way way/7712049
It seems you changed that way accidentially.

Okay. What do you propose as correction?

Hi!
Do you know if this way way/216444836 is connected to
node/4692097575 ?

Hi! Please review:
You used the unusual taghighway=nonexistent
to map a way that no longer exists.
way/399401575
Do you know if that path ever existed?
I think either was:highway=path or maybe
histioric:highway=path are feasable.
See osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Hi! Please review:
You used unusual tags like highway="doesnot exist!"
or highway="doesnotexist!"
to map a way that no longer exists.
way/70911839
way/437461426
Do you know if that track ever existed?
I think either was:highway=track or maybe
histioric:highway=track are feasable.
See osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Hi!
I've noticed this changeset because of the typo highway=Farmington Canal
on way/496240468
You seem to use the name tag to describe the object. This is not good, see
name=*
If you think that a further description is needed you can use description=* or add a note.

I've changed it to height now.

I've tried to correct it, see changeset/51799211

Hi and welcome to OSM!
The ususual tag for this is amenity=weighbridge, see osm.wiki/Tag%3Aamenity%3Dweighbridge
for details how to map

Moin!
Bitte mal prüfen:
Du hast einige Wege mit dem unüblichem tag highway=footpath erzeugt. Sind das highway=path oder highway=footway?
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rwm

I've fixed them now, see changeset/51798478