OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
50645146 over 8 years ago

Hi!
Please check typo highway=ter on
way/8767499
To me it looks like a secodary_link .
It also seems to be connected to the wrong lane (oneway) in the south.

37813100 over 8 years ago

Hi!
Please check typo(?) highway=street_sign on these two ways:
way/403574708
way/403574710
Was it intended? Is it a traffic_sign=* ?

49100486 over 8 years ago

Hi!
Please check typo highway=street_lamp on
way/496889601
Looks like a barrier=hedge, but maybe you know more?

50432021 over 8 years ago

Hi!
Please review typo (?) highway=stream
on way/508972904
I guess you meant waterway=stream + intermittent=yes ?
See also intermittent=*

41580926 over 8 years ago

Hi!
Please check: What did you try to map here?
way/438187615

42104174 over 8 years ago

Hi!
Please review way
way/442080900
I guess you wanted to map a trunk_link?

41473518 over 8 years ago

Moin!
Mir ist aufgefallen, das Du gelegentlich Objekte mit highway=turning_circle wie dieses erzeugst:
way/437345862#map=19/51.30286/6.59065
Passiert offensichtlich aus Versehen, aber vielleicht kannst Du mal drauf achten. Oder ist das doch Absicht?
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rgv

45489359 over 8 years ago

Hi!
Please review way/468844630
The sat images show an amenity=parking,
not a circular way. A turning_circle should be mapped as a node, not a way. See also highway=turning_circle

46807516 over 8 years ago

Hi!
Du hast duiverse Wege auf highway=turning_circle geändert. Dabei gibt es zwei Probleme:
1) Das tag sollte nur für Punkte verwendet werden
2) Man sollte zwischen turning_loop und turning_circle unterscheiden
Was war denn die maproulette Aufgabe?

51137249 over 8 years ago

OK, thanks!

51137249 over 8 years ago

Hi!
Please review:
Some ways in this area have a highway=turning_circle tag as well as a power=line. The highway tag is obviously a typo, but what was meant ?
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rgn

39713081 over 8 years ago

Hi!
Please review this crossing:
way/422224806
The tag highway=mini_roundabout is for nodes, this looks more like a junction=roundabout, but the sat image is not clear enough. See also
junction=roundabout#Possible_misinterpretations
What do you think?

50072070 over 8 years ago

HI and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this change because you used highway=mini_roundabout to map a roundabout. I've changed that to junction=roundabout. See also
junction=roundabout#Possible_misinterpretations
OK?

46526252 over 8 years ago

Hi!
Please review :
You used highway=mini_roundabout on ways. The tag should only be used on nodes.
I think way/164349393
is a mini_roundabout, but sat images show an obstacle in the middle of way/154079742
so that is probably a junction=roundabout?
See also junction=roundabout#Possible_misinterpretations

38455443 over 8 years ago

Hi!
Please review way/226829423
The tag highway=mini_roundabout should only be used on nodes, I think what you meant is a junction=roundabout or maybe
just a circular road without special rights of way. See also junction=roundabout#Possible_misinterpretations

51155632 over 8 years ago

Please check also this one:
way/515978533

51155632 over 8 years ago

Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed that you map the inner areas of roundabout as highway=mini_roundabout + landuse=grass
The landuse tag is good, but the highway tag is wrong is this context.
See also osm.wiki/Tag%3Ajunction%3Droundabout
Why are there two inner rings? Different height?

15811471 over 8 years ago

Hi!
I know this is a litte late ;-)
I've noticed this change because I am trying to fix some wrong roundabout mappings, and this way poped up:
way/232268404#map=19/55.59311/-2.43168
Was this an early version of what now is done with area:highway=* ?

44083654 over 8 years ago

Hi!
I've noticed this changeset because you've used highway=mini_roundabout on a way. The tag is meant to be used on nodes only.
The sat image seems to show an obstacle in the middle, in this case it would be a junction=roundabout
See also junction=roundabout

39110926 over 8 years ago

I did not delete anything here, but you did something similar by changing them and your comment seems to say that this was intended. So I am not sure now how what you intended to do.