Hi!
I've noticed that you sometime use
highway=driveway instead of highway=service + service=driveway
Is this intended?

Hi!
I've noticed that you sometime use
highway=driveway instead of highway=service + service=driveway
Is this intended?

Hi!
I've noticed that you sometime use
highway=driveway instead of highway=service + service=driveway
Is this intended?

Hi!
Please review typo highway=byway_open_to_all_traffic
on way/429723068
Guess you refer to
highway=byway

OK. Have a nice holydays!

Hi!
I've noticed that you have added a few ways with highway=truck . I assume you always meant highway=track ?
If yes, please make sure to check the auto-complete function in JOSM ;-)

Hi!
Please review typo highway=truck
on way/503013823
Guess you meant track?

Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed that you changed some ways
from highway=residential to highway=Jalan or jalan. I think the old tagging was correct.
Please check highway=*

Hi!
I've corrected a typo highway=platforms -> platform here, but it seems that the geometry in the south of way way/421116964
is not correct. I assume the platform ends somewhere higher north. Do you know this place?

Sorry, wrong link. Here is the right one:
http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/highway-residential-link-td5859566.html

Sorry, wrong link. Here is the right one:
http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/highway-residential-link-td5859566.html

Moin!
Du verwendest hier und anderswo das tag highway=residential_link
Bitte mach das nicht, es gibt weder unclassified_link noch residential_link
Siehe auch http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Undiscussed-edits-removing-lesser-used-highway-tags-td5859298.html#a5859559

Hi!
Please don't use the tag highway=residential_link, this type doesn't "exist". See also http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Undiscussed-edits-removing-lesser-used-highway-tags-td5859298.html#a5859559

Hi!
Please don't use the tag highway=residential_link, this type doesn't "exist". See also http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Undiscussed-edits-removing-lesser-used-highway-tags-td5859298.html#a5859559

Hi!
Please don't use the tag highway=residential_link, this type doesn't "exist". See also http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Undiscussed-edits-removing-lesser-used-highway-tags-td5859298.html#a5859559

Moin!
Du verwendest hier und anderswo das tag highway=residential_link
Bitte mach das nicht, es gibt weder unclassified_link noch residential_link
Siehe auch http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Undiscussed-edits-removing-lesser-used-highway-tags-td5859298.html#a5859559

Hi!
I've noticed that you changed some highways to "unclassified link"
Please don't do that. See also this discussion in the tagging list:
http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Undiscussed-edits-removing-lesser-used-highway-tags-td5859298.html#a5859559

A possible alternative may be highway=virtual
It is also undocumented and not often used (64 times) but at least more self explaining,
and I think it is used for the same purpose.

Hi!
Please check way way/425947353
Is that a highway around the building?

Hi!
I've fixed a typo highway=unclassfied instead of highway=unclassified
on several ways in this area. This is probably caused by the auto complete function in JOSM, so watch out ;-)
See also changeset/51407402