Gazer75's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 33001846 | about 10 years ago | Om du sjekker wiki så snakkar den faktisk om city for byer over 100k.
|
| 33001846 | about 10 years ago | Trur vi må ta vurdering etter andre kriterier. Rjukan har også by status men under 1500 innbyggere ;) |
| 33001846 | about 10 years ago | Why was Ski upgraded to city? If a place with 10-15000 people is considered a city then we have a lot of them :) Listed population is for the entire municipality and not the town itself. According to SSB the town itself has 12344. Population number set currently includes Ås as well. |
| 34399704 | about 10 years ago | A Bing offset of 2.35; 13.70 is good for the houses you added. |
| 34399704 | about 10 years ago | Please undo this set. Aerials in this area is badly aligned. Its clearly visible when you look at the house numbers. They are from the Norwegian mapping agency and are normally accurate to less than a meter. They are also normally placed at the house main entrance. |
| 34002266 | over 10 years ago | Du har sett feil klasse på fv 561. Den skal vere primary. |
| 32844327 | over 10 years ago | Never use Bing to correct data unless you've surveyed it. Especially house number nodes are never to be moved unless surveyed. Data from the Norwegian Mapping Authority (Kartverket) is usually of better quality. If you notice a large number of number nodes not aligning with Bing then Bing is most likely bad.
|
| 33209912 | over 10 years ago | Do not move house numbers imported from the Norwegian Mapping Authority unless you know it is wrong from gps or local knowledge. And never use Bing over data from "Kartverket". Only reason to do that is if you have local knowledge from survey or GPS that match Bing. I have already corrected the house number nodes and roads moved in this changeset. |
| 33387657 | over 10 years ago | The number of digits have nothing to do with it. Its the background of the sign that is important. National roads and E routes use green. Primary county roads use white.
|
| 33447799 | over 10 years ago | Please revert the road class changes. They are wrong. E route and national highways in Norway are trunk class. |
| 33387657 | over 10 years ago | Please do not change road class unless you know how the system works in Norway. This road is a national highway and is therefore a trunk road. Please revert this change. |
| 33446434 | over 10 years ago | Why did you change this? This road is an E route road and thus should be trunk. All E routes and national highways in Norway will always be trunk or higher class. |
| 32830488 | over 10 years ago | Kva source har du brukt? Manuel leiting på nett? |
| 32830488 | over 10 years ago | Denne laga veldig mange duplikat. Ver så snill å samle data med eksisterande. |
| 32741946 | over 10 years ago | Waste of time to do any coastline edits with Bing in Norway. They are being updated slowly by better data from Norwegian Mapping Authority. Bing is also not adviced to use much in Norway as its often badly georeferenced. |
| 32460404 | over 10 years ago | Wikien kan endrast litt. Strava ligg inne alt og treng ikkje leggjast til i JOSM |
| 32460404 | over 10 years ago | Hah! Ja Bing er håplaust mange plassar. Ser at fv60 frå Hellesylt til Sykkylven er ganske ille. Skal sjå om eg kan ta den med NVDB/Elveg overlay ein dag. Er nokre tettstader som er mappa med dårleg Bing som vil krevje masse arbeid å rette opp i. |
| 31962621 | over 10 years ago | Stemmer. Det var vel ledebil gjennom der ei stund. |
| 31962621 | over 10 years ago | Kvar har du dette frå? |
| 30492546 | over 10 years ago | 651 Volda-Nordfjordeid is still a national highway and thus a trunk road. Please revert this change. |