Gazer75's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 141495337 | over 2 years ago | Sidan du ikkje kan vise til eit vedtak frå kommunen så kan stien vere der og folk kan bruke den. Om du fortset og slette så vil du bli rapportert til DWG for vandalisme. |
| 141495337 | over 2 years ago | Reversert. Allemannsretten vil gjelde her. |
| 141298893 | over 2 years ago | Suggestion:
|
| 141298893 | over 2 years ago | The tags hour_on and hour_off is not really valid anymore if they were ever used. You'd have to use conditional restrictions to define when the gate is closed to general traffic. |
| 140169928 | over 2 years ago | Har reversert og lagt inn access tag på vegen. |
| 140169928 | over 2 years ago | Ikkje slett vegar på den måten. Om dette er ein privat veg som er skilta private eller avstengt så kan du legge på access tags. Står info om dette på wiki |
| 139911937 | over 2 years ago | Pretty sure that way/1163848956 need to be replaced by way/1163848955
|
| 127814304 | over 2 years ago | Of course, my bad... I find it hard to figure out who made the actual error. |
| 127814304 | over 2 years ago | Please don't duplicate charging stations. The node is for a group of chargers, not individual dispensers. I've removed the duplicates leaving one as it should be. |
| 137466895 | over 2 years ago | Hit enter to early on accident.
|
| 136959860 | over 2 years ago | I've reverted this already. The bottom part of that article mentioned that the old tunnel is closed for upgrades until 2024. |
| 136959860 | over 2 years ago | This is wrong. The old tunnel is closed for upgrades while the new south tube is open. Please revert your changes. |
| 130967963 | over 2 years ago | Where did you get the voltages from? AFAIK they are all wrong unless they recently built a new substation at the Charlottetown generating station. Last I heard that was not happening before 2030 or something.
|
| 130888641 | over 2 years ago | Did they rebuild way/942697064 as dual circuit recently? |
| 130883424 | over 2 years ago | Looks like you've just selected all nodes in the line and tagged it as a power=pole completely disregarding my detailed mapping. Like the terminal at the transition station. Please don't do this and ruin other peoples work. Thank you. |
| 130883424 | over 2 years ago | Why did you change the towers to poles? That is not accurate for that high voltage level no matter the design. Those are towers. Poles are for distribution lines mostly. |
| 30434146 | over 2 years ago | Om du tenker way, så kan den sikkert det. Er mykje gammalt N50 som ikkje lenger stemmer. Folk fiksar litt her og der etter kvart. Berre litt viktig at ein har kontroll på relasjonar og forstår korleis dei fungerer. |
| 133275324 | almost 3 years ago | I'd suggest going with the lifecycle prefix was:*=* on the tags for the ferries. Disused might not be supported in many cases, and many maps will still show a route as long as the ferry tags are there. A was:route=ferry will not. |
| 113340063 | almost 3 years ago | Careful when editing. You managed to move way/709830242 back to the old 66kV spot. I had made a note on the line warning about this :) Maxar was more up to date in the area than the Norwegian orthophoto. Currently only the low res orthophoto layer is up to date.
|
| 123176876 | almost 3 years ago | This is not a proper tag for peoples driveway. It also blocks proper routing.
This tag would only apply to fenced off areas with locked gates. |