Hei, velkomen til OSM. Tok og fiksa litt på tagginga av butikken. Adresse nodar i OSM er automatisk oppdatert frå kartverket og bør ikkje endrast på. Lag ny node for butikken.

Norway, Sweden and Demark have all incorporated the E route numbering so any E route is signed as such and have no other number.
What "standardization"? The E route network has clearly defined single digit numbers with no leading zero. You're basically tagging a value that doesn't exist on the ground which is against OSM policy.
As far as I know none of the active mappers in Norway care about int refs and relations related to this so they will probably not be maintained by us.
The tagging of int ref that is the same or similar creates some map visual problem as well. Maps that actually want to display both due to ref and int ref being different are a visual mess displaying E06 and E6 over each other.

Setting access=private will prevent all routing to those places. Living street is also only used where the street is signposted with "gatetun" sign. Please read the wiki on mapping. osm.wiki/Norway/Highways

Please return 557 to primary. This is a county road and thus a primary, not trunk. Please read the wiki on proper tagging of highways in Norway.

Bør sette opp skilt med privat sti og vedtaket frå kommunen då. Stien er der visuelt så den skal vere i OSM men med access=private ;)

Har denne stien vore vurdert juridisk? Allemannsretten kan nok trumfe her sidan den går på grensa mellom to hytter.

What is the point of adding int_ref to roads where ref and int_ref is the same? At least use proper numbers on single digit digit refs like E 1-9. They do not have a leading 0.

I'll add a place node at the intersection that uses Austrepollen as main name and Mauranger as alt name. Please contact municipality or and/or kartverket and make a case for name change or something for this. For a name change I believe the municipality has to do it. If you gather more people in the area and contact them as a group it might help. I believe private person can only request name change of a farm they own.

I think maybe Snapchat uses a 3rd party supplier of data. Someone told me it might be Mapbox, and they update their data from OSM very rarely these days as they wanted oversight to avoid bad data.
So even if we do a change in the map it might take months or years. I've seen maps in media based on OSM from Mapbox that are very old. Like on nrk.no and VG and so on.

It would be just like the farm names in the area basically. A point on the map.

How maps and apps choose to use an alt_name or loc_name depends on them. Usually i would say Mauranger as that is the main name.

Places are not really defined as areas in OSM, but rather as points on the map. One reason for that is that there is no defined area legally or physically on the ground, and it would just lead to arguments and tagging wars.

A hamlet is just above a farm in OSM, but below a village, so it will display sooner on maps that support the distinction. Village really should have some amenities like a store and a school. When working on an import of SSR I think the community landed on using hamlet for places defined as "bygdelag" in SSR.

Best option we can do in OSM for cases like this would be to add a node with place=hamlet + name=Mauranger + alt_name=Austrepollen. The node would then be put at the SSR location for Mauranger at the intersection between fv49 and fv500.

Complain to the municipality and/or Kartverket if you feel its wrong. We kind of have to follow the official data if OSM is to be taken serious by gov. agencies and more.

The hamlet is actually called Mauranger in Kartverket data. https://www.norgeskart.no/#!?project=norgeskart&layers=1002&zoom=14&lat=6697662.11&lon=18986.49&sok=mauranger&markerLat=6697662.110554731&markerLon=18986.487201736483&panel=searchOptionsPanel

https://stadnamn.kartverket.no/fakta/281363

Residential areas are also used as lancover for just that, a built up residential area, not for making a big random square over other landcover types like you do.

That doesn't change the official fact that there is no residential area or village name in Kartverket data. If you feel there should be then complain to them.

Please stop adding a big box with residential for Austrepollen. There is no such thing. Austrepollen is a road name and a bay, not a residential area.

There is no int_ref for this road as its a country road with number 546. Please remove the int_ref from Fanavegen.

You are breaking several land cover relations with your edits. Suggest using JOSM editor that is better at dealing with these. Also try reducing the areas you edit in the beginning.

Why keep changing this from official plans? The final road will be imported from NVDB when its done anyway.

Why are you setting this as construction? Did they actually start on the last part if the ring road?
Haven't heard anything about this on relevant project sites.