OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
44715724 about 9 years ago

Veit ikkje kven som har lagt motortrafikkveg inn der, men det er feil. Teknisk sett så er faktisk "trunk" i OSM det samme som motortrafikkveg her i Norge, men sidan vi brukar den på alle riks- og europavegar, så blir det feil. Vi brukar motorroad=yes på motortrafikkveg.

Ver snill å reversere dette.

43088144 about 9 years ago

Please don't alter roads that have already been improved with data from Kartverket and/or NVDB. Unless you use an industrial grade GPS, or the road have changed significantly, data from Kartverket will always be better quality.

44168333 about 9 years ago

Vaskehallen er ikkje teikna inn på kartet. Det du markerte som vaskehall her faktisk taket på truck diesel pumpene :)

42679735 about 9 years ago

Did they actually close this before completing the new temporary ramp?
There is no mention of this on the projects Facebook page.

43068202 about 9 years ago

Short constructions like this do not really warrant a map edit. There will be a lot of tunnels closed at different times due to maintenance.

42236483 about 9 years ago

The access=no tag is a blanket one that will not allow anything. Should never be used unless completely closed. Simply use foot=no and bicycle=no

42236483 about 9 years ago

Is the tunnel closed? Can't find any info about that at http://www.vegvesen.no/trafikkbeta?lat=59.28118&long=10.42620&zoom=12

42287018 about 9 years ago

Du har laga alt for komplisert kryss mellom rv3 rampar og fv215/601. Heilt unødvedig og kan lage rare problem for ruting software.
Skal heller ikkje vere eigen "way" for avkøyringsfelt (Haugedalsveien mot rv3) i OSM. Bruk heller turn:lanes=

41837245 over 9 years ago

Never replace existing roads unless you have local knowledge of the road and know that what is there is wrong ;)

41837245 over 9 years ago

I had that intersection perfectly mapped out before you replaced it with Elveg :)

41837245 over 9 years ago

Intersection for fv410 and 420 needs a lot of fixing. Do not use separate ways for lanes at intersections and crossing ways over another like this.
Use turn lanes and turn restrictions.
Only lanes physically divded by kerbs or similar should have separate ways.

41640846 over 9 years ago

Please use english description.

From google translate I see you used BIng to map this? I would advice against using Bing in Norway unless you have very good reference gps points or local knowledge. The Bing aerials are often very poorly georectified in Norway.

41281860 over 9 years ago

Vær snill å ikkje kall "changesets" for Div. Gi meir info om kva som er endra.

41322896 over 9 years ago

Vegen kunne vel like godt vore fjerna heilt då den ikkje vil sjå ut slik i framtida? Ny veg ligg inne som "construction".

41293653 over 9 years ago

Import av ein kommune så stor som Gulen ville nok eg brukt noken timar på. Den er ikkje den verste pga lite eksisterande data.
Hyllestad rett nord for Gulen brukte eg vel halve dagen på ;)

41354267 over 9 years ago

Someone need to revert this change. All supermarkets like this should have its location name. Makes it easier to look up in a navigation device.

41293653 over 9 years ago

Your import made duplicate ways along the coastline. Also the coastlines have no dates from Kartverket. And please check existing data before overwriting with an import. I've had to fix all the ferry terminals...

40934441 over 9 years ago

The entire stretch of road is still under construction? I thought the road past the residential area at Espavegen 781 is not closed?

40934441 over 9 years ago

Why change this to construction?

40746367 over 9 years ago

This change broke relation/5302948
If you do not know how to deal with large multipolygons then please ask for help fixing errors.

I have fixed the problem.