Gazer75's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 68218183 | almost 7 years ago | Hei og velkomen til OSM. Vær forsiktig med å redigere relasjonar når du brukar iD editoren(redigerer rett in nettlesar). Den lagar ofte masse rot. Vil anbefale JOSM til meir avansert redigering. Har fiksa alle feil ;) |
| 66894128 | almost 7 years ago | Even so, there was a start date on the building that should be a clue. It was set as 2017. Also make sure you use Norwegian Orthophoto as background imagery in Norway. Unless the imagery_used value bugged the changeset is showing Bing. |
| 66894128 | almost 7 years ago | Please do not change things without local knowledge, or contacting previous mapper. There is a new swimming hall built here now. I have reverted your edit already btw. |
| 67295262 | almost 7 years ago | Er du på IRC? kom innom på irc.oftc.org #osm-no og helse på oss andre som er aktive ;) |
| 67295262 | almost 7 years ago | Har du lest på på wikien? osm.wiki/WikiProject_Norway/Norwegian_Infrastructure_networks |
| 67295262 | almost 7 years ago | This is not a minor line. 33kV and below are minor. |
| 66885959 | almost 7 years ago | Om du høgre klikker så får du ein meny som lar deg lage rette kantar på bygningen ;) |
| 54472621 | almost 7 years ago | I see. I could not see the line many places on aerials and there was no source mentioned anywhere. I guess it is ok to tag it as 765kV if the towers are marked with that. I'm used to having official numbers here with actual operating voltage. So I put design voltage in a note for future reference. |
| 54472621 | almost 7 years ago | What source was used for this "765kV" line? If it is operating at 400kV then tag it as such, not the design voltage. Leave that in the note. |
| 65817630 | almost 7 years ago | I applied a bit of a bigger fix now to make them multipolys. Kind of strange that JOSM didn't warn, the wood relation was clearly not closed. |
| 65817630 | almost 7 years ago | Please learn how to do relations and multipolygons. This edit broke a big wood relation. Landuse in Norway is not built with closed polygons connected. |
| 65506113 | about 7 years ago | Why did you change road classes around Vinstra? Do you know how the road classification system work for Norway? |
| 61728864 | about 7 years ago | Kan vere nedlagt eller bytta til eit anna selskap |
| 64344670 | about 7 years ago | Never revert changes before talking to the person who made the change. I expect you to fix this revert within 24 hours. |
| 64344670 | about 7 years ago | Do not make changes when you have no knowledge. Please read my changeset before. The changes were done cause the E134 is extended to E6 from 11. November 2018. |
| 64147325 | about 7 years ago | Description should be: Updated Lysebotn and Tjodan hydro plants. Update Lysebotn substation and some 132kV lines |
| 63847977 | about 7 years ago | So you're saying it was on the Norwegian orthophoto and it still flagged the changeset imagery_used with Bing? |
| 63847977 | about 7 years ago | Please do NOT use Bing aerial in Norway!
|
| 54530746 | over 7 years ago | I had a hard time finding appropriate tags when I mapped this. The wiki is kind of messy when it comes to hydro power and all its components. I didn't map many of these tunnels for the plants as the data is very basic. |
| 62321193 | over 7 years ago | Do not change hamlets. It is not OSMs responsibility to fix geocoding errors. Read about tagging Norwegian places on wiki. |