Service roads as an area are being highlighted as an error in OSM issues.
Service roads should be a line.

A round Asda ?

The airstrip is still there. Info was added to it. Runway number, length, width, surface and name.

Hello.
This caravan site is still listed on the Camping and Caravan website. It is only closed due to covid, as are all their sites. I wouldn't say they are disused.

Could you please indicate which mailing list you are referring to.

You are using the base layer in Osmand. You have not configured any profiles in the app. There are many settings, map styles and map types. They in turn can be configured in numerous ways.

My maps have again had a full update today. All your amendments on my cycling profile still show as footpaths. I have used Osmand for cycle touring for many years so I do know my why around the app.

Using one 14 minute video to somehow validate the use of a “path” is not credible. I have lived in Chichester since 1994. I know how all cycle paths in the area are utilised.

LCN 88 is connected to and forms part of National Cycle Route 2 which passes through Chichester. Details can be found here.

.https://www.sustrans.org.uk/find-a-route-on-the-national-cycle-network/centurion-way/

As custodians of the cycle network Sustrans state on the above website that
“The Centurion Way is part of the National Cycle Network, cared for by Sustrans”.
Their logo also appears on the routes information boards,

I repeat OSM works on the principle of identifying the significant. I think you should show good grace and withdraw.

Your first point is incorrect. Osmand update their maps once a month. The current map rending is from my tags not yours.
Your second point is inaccurate. As a resident and cyclist in Chichester I am fully aware how cycle routes are utilised.
Your third point is also incorrect. If you were to subscribe to Osmand Live and obtain up to date maps you would see that the ways that you have altered are rendered as footpaths.
Your actions have caused unnecessary conflict. You have made alterations without having the decency to discuss the matter with the original mapper first. You are now expecting others at OSM to expend resources on a matter that did not require resolving in the first place. I think you should bow out and reflect.

.

No.I am using Osmand Live with the latest map updates and cycling profile set. How an element is rendered is fundamental to how it is interpreted hence my comments. A significant and meaningful characteristic of the ways is that cyclists are permitted. OSM works by identifying the significant. Your changeset has ignored that principle and tagged the generic. As a result the map is diminished.

I am referring to all the alterations to cycle routes around Chichester.
It is an unnecessary and counter productive change. The original tag ( which is allowed ) meant cycle routes would be rendered on Osmand. Now cyclists just see what looks like a footpath rendered on the map.

I was wondering why you changed these routes to paths. They are signposted as combined cycle routes / footpaths. The original tag was correct.
highway=cycleway

There is a turn restriction on Church Rd. One may turn left onto Westhampnett Rd but not turn right on the roundabout.

Hello.
Would you consider changing this feature to "proposed" As it now stands this road is live in Osmand.
Regards.
Gavin Meredith.

Hello.
Crossed Wootton Bridge this afternoon. It would appear this is now a signposted cycle route. Didn`t stop to check where it ended though. Late for ferry.
Regards.
Gavin Meredith.

Slipway station demolished June / July 2017.

Thanks for that James.

Hello James.
Bit of a disagreement in cycling circles over the extent of the eastern section of the promenade cycle path. Arun Council state that .

"The approved cycle route in Bognor Regis runs from the western boundary of The Beach Estate near Culver Road Greensward, past Outram Road, Butlins and the pier and ends at The Waverley Hotel where cyclists must rejoin the road.
https://www.arun.gov.uk/aruns-beaches

Would it be possible to investigate / review.
Regards.
Gavin.

Hello James.
Would it be possible to review the cyclepath down Flansham Lane.
Regards.
Gavin.

Hello Mike.
All done. Thanks for the advice.
Gavin.

Hello.
I don't believe the way down Flansham Lane is a cyclepath. I think it ends below the Flansham Lane roundabout.

Yes I cycled down there yesterday from Shripney Lane. I did not see any signs indicating a cyclepath. Facing north at the Shripney road roundabout, (where one crosses to Charles Purley Way) there is a sign on a bollard indicating "end of route". The way up to Shripney lane is effectively barred.