建设中的道路不要删除，不要使用高德这种地图

辅助线不应该上传到OSM画完就应该删除

分割站台没有任何的意义

是在搞不懂阁下添加这种车次的关系意义何在，而且只添加了一半。首先无法确保车次每次停靠同一个站台吧？另外一个上海虹桥今天查询车次就有650次，如果都添加关系后面想优化车站以及沿线铁轨的用户都不用编辑了。

stop的位置是体现车头停靠的位置，高铁站有一个牌子，所以不可能在中间，对于这种有雨棚的大型车展绘制这种node意义不大。更不要说是错的了

没有共轨这种说法

DWG你们是调查还是拖延时间？眼见为实的道路以及 https://www.sentinel-hub.com/explore/sentinel-playground 可以搜索到的最新卫星图都是实打实的证据。

DWG你们是调查还是拖延时间？眼见为实的道路以及 https://www.sentinel-hub.com/explore/sentinel-playground 可以搜索到的最新卫星图都是实打实的证据。

[Ticket#2021090510000032] Re: Regarding the unreasonable border retrea [...]

Data Working Group <[email protected]>

Hello,

this is an automated reply. Your request has been recorded as Ticket#2021090510000032 and will be processed by one of the members of Data Working Group in due course.

Please understand that our working group consists of volunteers only who do this job in their spare time. All incoming messages are read but processing them can take a little time.

Best regards
OSMF Data Working group

--
OTRS [email protected]

so DWG need so long？ one year? or ten year?

麻烦吧 “柴达木线和柴木线合并为哈木线，”操作撤回。

https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/q16Foj93zqPCH_YKkkHqeg

https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/50kJqldS18iV0ijHloD90A

https://news.sina.cn/sa/2009-07-07/detail-ikkntian1800964.d.html?from=wap

https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/nrLtd0CO-xNwqov0N5Q0RA

There are a large number of Chinese-controlled roads in this area of Doklam, and Bhutan has almost no actual control nodes, but the entire area is returned to be displayed as Bhutanese territory; if you zoom in and look at the detailed OSM data, for example, the roads can find China to the disputed area here. There are many roads, and there are administrative villages here.

also see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pangda

有明确的道路数据可以证明控制归属，不理解阁下为何如此编辑？

plz delete

强烈建议你多看下街景，一大堆东西可以证明你的用法在实体道路上不存在，有争议讨论或者交流给文献，你大改一通后还整个南二环出来。

既然你说南二环是有报道的，那你解释下百度地图里面2020年街景为啥还是写着昌南大道。

沿江快速路 我看过那个石头，但是那个是个石头，你能用那个确定全段都这样叫？只不过是推断罢了。真正确认的还不是要靠每个路口的指示牌

另外国道就用trunk，用什么primary？

东一环路我也看到了很多指示牌写着 洪都高架快速路，建议你都多跑跑仔细看看

自己开车去看看，多看看每个匝道上下去看下。

大学你改你没错啊，你改什么道路啊？