FreedSky's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 83747308 | over 5 years ago | 我搞不懂了,OSM什么时候搞老用户的封用户限制了?我编辑了什么内容你完全可以看的到,如果你觉得我这样的编辑非常影响工作麻烦发消息提醒我,此外我也没有破坏任何东西,我只是实际编辑了中国设立行政单位罢了。 |
| 83747904 | over 5 years ago | i think english no Zhongsha%20Islands this concept?
China set up two city jurisdictions yesterday and will host Zhongsha, so the place may not be suitable for using the city. |
| 83747904 | over 5 years ago | https://amti.csis.org/scarborough-shoal/ Who controls Scarborough Shoal?
|
| 83747625 | over 5 years ago | https://amti.csis.org/scarborough-shoal/ Who controls Scarborough Shoal?
|
| 82697829 | over 5 years ago | The 2016 judgment cannot change the large amount of literature on the islands actually controlled by China that can be searched through the Internet. OSM should show the actual control situation, not a judgment that China does not recognize. |
| 82698613 | over 5 years ago | The 2016 judgment cannot change the large amount of literature on the islands actually controlled by China that can be searched through the Internet. OSM should show the actual control situation, not a judgment that China does not recognize. |
| 82698844 | over 5 years ago | The 2016 judgment cannot change the large amount of literature on the islands actually controlled by China that can be searched through the Internet. OSM should show the actual control situation, not a judgment that China does not recognize. |
| 82700210 | over 5 years ago | The 2016 judgment cannot change the large amount of literature on the islands actually controlled by China that can be searched through the Internet. OSM should show the actual control situation, not a judgment that China does not recognize. |
| 82699336 | over 5 years ago | The 2016 judgment cannot change the large amount of literature on the islands actually controlled by China that can be searched through the Internet. OSM should show the actual control situation, not a judgment that China does not recognize. |
| 82442643 | over 5 years ago | 兰新我改成 disused 是因为这段铁路现在的确不使用了。 |
| 81339542 | almost 6 years ago | 不要加站,不要加。 |
| 81339542 | almost 6 years ago | Do not add the words "railway station" in the name=* i.e. avoid name=Station Newton |
| 81035212 | almost 6 years ago | 有用的这个node。
|
| 80857013 | almost 6 years ago | Same for Vietnam control |
| 80857013 | almost 6 years ago | If the Philippines control is revised, please also provide reliable literature. |
| 80857013 | almost 6 years ago | From various news reports in 2012, it is confirmed that Scarborough Shoal has been controlled by China; if it is modified to be neutral, please provide reliable literature on China's withdrawal, you can refer to the situation of China and Japan on the Diaoyu Islands; Give reliable literature. |
| 74461093 | about 6 years ago | 您写的内容用户可以打开wikipedia查看,请不要把单独一段对于菲律宾有利的内容放在一个只有中国稳定控制岛屿的群岛区域。 这是极其不中立的行为。 正确的做法是,赶走黄岩岛的中国军方,让菲律宾的军队驻扎,建岛移民。
This is an extremely neutral behavior. The correct way is to drive away the Chinese military on Huangyan Island, let the Philippine troops station, and build island immigrants. |
| 74461235 | about 6 years ago | OSM只体现事实,请你给出菲律宾控制黄岩岛的资料。 OSM only reflects the facts. Please give information on the Philippines' control of Huangyan Island. |
| 74461257 | about 6 years ago | OSM只体现事实,请你给出菲律宾控制黄岩岛的资料。 OSM only reflects the facts. Please give information on the Philippines' control of Huangyan Island. |
| 74461093 | about 6 years ago | OSM只体现事实,请你给出菲律宾控制黄岩岛的资料。
|