OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
149766710 over 1 year ago

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
See my previous comment on a changeset.
This changeset shows the same issues.
Please do not include a shadow of a building into a mapping.
Best regards
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149766710

149766710 over 1 year ago

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
See my previous comment on a changeset.
This changeset shows the same issues.
Please do not include a shadow of a building into a mapping.
Best regards
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149766710

149767230 over 1 year ago

We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM.
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Not always accurate mapped.

Buildings not squared.

Buildings oversized.

Explanation can be found in this document what might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149767230

149767996 over 1 year ago

Hello Thanks for mapping.
Here you tend to oversize some buildings.
When the shadow of a building is visible, the shadow limits also the length of a building.
Best regards
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149767996

149768507 over 1 year ago

Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and well mapped.
Where buildings are hidden by trees, you tend to map the building (under the tree) too big.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested.
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149768507

149767550 over 1 year ago

Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and well mapped.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested.
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149767550

149767416 over 1 year ago

We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM.
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
I reviewed all changesets issues by you today.
You mapped with a serious offset. Correct that please.
Be more accurate at mapping complex buildings. Most corners are 90 degr.
Not squared buildings

Explanation can be found in this document what might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149767416

149766990 over 1 year ago

We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
These changeset of totday are reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM.
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
In general well mapped.
Issues :
when there is no shadow, it's probably not a building.
Don't cluster buildings.

Explanation can be found in this document what might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149766990

149766012 over 1 year ago

Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. All changesets till now have been reviewed. Well and accurate mapped. However, sometimes you included the shadow of the building.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested.
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149766012

149766248 over 1 year ago

We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
The changesets of today are reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM.
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped buildings.
Included shadow of the building into your mappings.
Followed treelines rather than extrapolating roofline.
Not all buildings are squared.

Explanation can be found in this document what might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149766248

149765596 over 1 year ago

Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. ( I reviewed all your changesets till now today) You forget to square the buildings sometimes.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested.
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149765596

148499977 almost 2 years ago

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Tracks and paths are default unpaved.
No need to add a surface tag,
Best regards.

149484834 almost 2 years ago

Hello Toon.
Why alter a correct tagged service way into a track ?
It connects a highway with a farm.
Best regards

149624945 almost 2 years ago

Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
One of the validator jobs is to reviews the taggings of highways . Experience learns that traces of highways are regularly wrong tagged.

How to decide when a trace is a path or an unclassified highway (main choices in rural areas)
First, look what they connect. Houses, settlements, villages. Then measure the width of that trace.

In iDeditor

Shortcut : Ctrl+⇧ Shift+M – toggle opens measurement panel
Draw a line between the shoulders of a trace (zoom in very far) and read the distance.
If a trace is max 2 meters wide, tag it as a path. Use footway only in urban (town) areas.
Wider and connect hamlets, houses and villages should be tagged as unclassified.
Tag residential in urban areas (villages, towns)

In JOSM, use the measure tab or, draw a circle (round building, shortcut Alt-Z when the building plugin is installed)) between the shoulders of a trace and read the distance on the lower toolbar. (don't map that bulding)

osm.wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
This is mentioned about tracks on the
osm.wiki/Routing#Routing_considerations

Quote: Tracks are roads of agricultural purpose. They usually connect fields to farms. The surface sometimes makes them inaccessible for regular cars, or at least limits the speeds to a very slow pace. Tracks should always be avoided for through-going traffic or within urban areas.

Important. Please connect highways to each other, where obvious, to get a network which can be used by GPS NAV systems.

Best regards

148638367 almost 2 years ago

We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM.
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings often oversized,

Included the shadow in a building.

Buildings not squared.

Buildings show pitched roof wrong mapped.

Traces without a shadow are mostly no buildings.

Explanation can be found in this document what might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148638367

148638367 almost 2 years ago

Hello, Thanks for mapping.
A remark about buildings partly hidden by trees.
Extrapolate the rooflines rather than following the tree lines.
Best regards and keep mapping

149614518 almost 2 years ago

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark about highway - waterway crossings.
Please add a node on the crossing and tag it as ford, bridge or culvert, depending on the situation.
Best regards

148346282 almost 2 years ago

Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
One of the validator jobs is to reviews the taggings of highways . Experience learns that traces of highways are regularly wrong tagged.

How to decide when a trace is a path or an unclassified highway (main choices in rural areas)
First, look what they connect. Houses, settlements, villages. Then measure the width of that trace.

In iDeditor

Shortcut : Ctrl+⇧ Shift+M – toggle opens measurement panel
Draw a line between the shoulders of a trace (zoom in very far) and read the distance.
If a trace is max 2 meters wide, tag it as a path. Use footway only in urban (town) areas.
Wider and connect hamlets, houses and villages should be tagged as unclassified.
Tag residential in urban areas (villages, towns)

In JOSM, use the measure tab or, draw a circle (round building, shortcut Alt-Z when the building plugin is installed)) between the shoulders of a trace and read the distance on the lower toolbar. (don't map that bulding)

osm.wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
This is mentioned about tracks on the
osm.wiki/Routing#Routing_considerations

Quote: Tracks are roads of agricultural purpose. They usually connect fields to farms. The surface sometimes makes them inaccessible for regular cars, or at least limits the speeds to a very slow pace. Tracks should always be avoided for through-going traffic or within urban areas.

Important. Please connect highways to each other, where obvious, to get a network which can be used by GPS NAV systems.

Best regards

149069548 almost 2 years ago

Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
One of the validator jobs is to reviews the taggings of highways . Experience learns that traces of highways are regularly wrong tagged.

How to decide when a trace is a path or an unclassified highway (main choices in rural areas)
First, look what they connect. Houses, settlements, villages. Then measure the width of that trace.

In iDeditor

Shortcut : Ctrl+⇧ Shift+M – toggle opens measurement panel
Draw a line between the shoulders of a trace (zoom in very far) and read the distance.
If a trace is max 2 meters wide, tag it as a path. Use footway only in urban (town) areas.
Wider and connect hamlets, houses and villages should be tagged as unclassified.
Tag residential in urban areas (villages, towns)

In JOSM, use the measure tab or, draw a circle (round building, shortcut Alt-Z when the building plugin is installed)) between the shoulders of a trace and read the distance on the lower toolbar. (don't map that bulding)

osm.wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
This is mentioned about tracks on the
osm.wiki/Routing#Routing_considerations

Quote: Tracks are roads of agricultural purpose. They usually connect fields to farms. The surface sometimes makes them inaccessible for regular cars, or at least limits the speeds to a very slow pace. Tracks should always be avoided for through-going traffic or within urban areas.

Important. Please connect highways to each other, where obvious, to get a network which can be used by GPS NAV systems.

Best regards

149615866 almost 2 years ago

Hallo Wim. Bedankt voor het mappen hier. Zou je de plaatsen waar highways een waterweg kruist voorzien van een type kruising op de node? Meestal volstaat een "ford"
Zorg dat er een node geplaatst wordt en geselecteerd op de kruising.
Vriendelijke groeten