Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please connect nodes of crossing roads to each other to get a network.
Gaps in a network means that a GPS nav system don't select that road in a route.
Best regards

Hello. Thanks for mapping. Your mappings are rather accurate !
Just a remark. When you map paths, or roads, please try to connect them to each other. That creates a network.
Best regards

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please check the width of a trace before tagging it. Traces as narrow as 2 mtr should be tagged as path rather than unclassified highway.
Best regards

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You changed a road , tagged 'unclassified' into 'track'
In my opinion, unclassified suits better because it directs to a small settlement.
This is what the wiki says about tracks
-----
highway=track This tag is usually used for roads providing access to agricultural or forestry facilities. In Africa, roads within National Parks mostly qualify as tracks too. If possible, please use also in conjunction with tracktype=*. Never use track to mark an unpaved or unsealed road in built-up areas. Such roads should be tagged according to the local conventions (usually highway=residential) and complemented by surface=*.
----
Another tagged 'track' changed to path due to the narrow trace (max 1.5 mtr wide) and the fact that it connects a settlement as well.
Best regards

We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM.
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared.
Included shadow into a mapping

Explanation can be found in this document what might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148375867

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
When you map wetland and water parts, please don't let them overlap each other.
These are errors and need to be solved.
Best regards

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
About tagging of narrow traces.
Footway is to be used in urban areas.
This is what the wiki says. Just tag them as path.
----
Paths are usually impassable for motorised vehicles. (However, African motorcyclists can sometimes do the most improbable stunts.) In order to mark a path as appropriate for cycling, add bicycle=yes. Never use path to mark an unpaved or unsealed road in built-up residential areas: Such roads should be tagged according to the local conventions (usually highway=residential if passable by vehicles and pedestrians, or highway=footway for pedestrian only where they can sometimes be separated from another parallel highway for vehicles) and complemented by surface=*.

Hello. Thanks for mapping on this projects.
You tagged all traces of roads as 'unclassified' ,even the very narrow ones.
Please measure the width of a trace before you tag it.
Narrow traces (<2 mtr = path) tag other unclassified.
How to measure the width of a road in IDeditor ?

Ctrl+⇧ Shift+M – toggle measurement panel
Draw a line between the shoulders of a trace (zoom in very far) and read the distance.

Best regards and keep mapping

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please tag a small stream as 'waterway=stream' . Not as water=stream.
Best regards

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
About tagging of narrow traces.
This is what the wiki says about it. Don't use the tag 'footway' here.
Best regards

Paths are usually impassable for motorised vehicles. (However, African motorcyclists can sometimes do the most improbable stunts.) In order to mark a path as appropriate for cycling, add bicycle=yes. Never use path to mark an unpaved or unsealed road in built-up residential areas: Such roads should be tagged according to the local conventions (usually highway=residential if passable by vehicles and pedestrians, or highway=footway for pedestrian only where they can sometimes be separated from another parallel highway for vehicles) and complemented by surface=*.

Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Please take the witdh of a trace into account when you tag it.
Narrow traces, <2 mtr should be tagged as path
How to measure the width of a road in IDeditor ?

Ctrl+⇧ Shift+M – toggle measurement panel

Best regards and keep mapping

Hello. A remark about tagging a trace as 'track'> Please read what the wiki says about it.
----
This tag is usually used for roads providing access to agricultural or forestry facilities. In Africa, roads within National Parks mostly qualify as tracks too. If possible, please use also in conjunction with tracktype=*. Never use track to mark an unpaved or unsealed road in built-up areas. Such roads should be tagged according to the local conventions (usually highway=residential) and complemented by surface=*.
Best regards

Thanks for mapping.
You tag paths as footway. Just the tag 'Path'is sufficient. Please read what the wiki says about it
----
Paths are usually impassable for motorised vehicles. (However, African motorcyclists can sometimes do the most improbable stunts.) In order to mark a path as appropriate for cycling, add bicycle=yes. Never use path to mark an unpaved or unsealed road in built-up residential areas: Such roads should be tagged according to the local conventions (usually highway=residential if passable by vehicles and pedestrians, or highway=footway for pedestrian only where they can sometimes be separated from another parallel highway for vehicles) and complemented by surface=*.

Best regards

Hello.
A remark about tagging of highways.
I noticed that you regularly tag very narrow <-2 mtr wide>traces as unclassified highways.
I think the tag path suits better here,

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please tag highways in according to the wiki as mentioned in the instructions.
You tagged many roads as residential,
but, they are mostly that narrow that path is a better choice.
Best regards

Thanks for mapping.
Please check the width of a road to decide how to tag.
Roads with 2 tracks are mostly únclassified, no path.
Best regards

Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and correct mapped. However, not all buildings are squared.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested.
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148439597

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please use the tag highway=unclassified,
The road is over 2 mtr wide, can be used by for wheel cars.

Best regards

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
When you map highways, please follow the traces more accurate and don't go through buildings.
Best regards and keep mapping
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148723112

Hello. A few remarks.
Just tag a building as building=yes.
Nothing else. and map them correct and squared.
Don't name objects. Leave that to local mappers.

Best regards