Did I say re-align ROAD? I mean re-align landuses *triple facepalm*

For the hundredth time, there's a Wikipedia article on Future Interstate corridors, with 7/9 being one of them. If this isn't evidence for the existence of a future I-7/I-9, then I don't know what is (I don't live in California, but I've been there many times).

First of all, these highways are already tagged as fut_ref=I 7;I 9. Secondly, this isn't "roadgeek speculation" because it represents an actual plan by California to add an Interstate to State Route 99. In fact, that's why it's been upgraded to freeway standards and will soon be upgraded to Interstate standards.

What do you mean? What "budget documents"?

Hello, where did you get the name of "Donovan Way Connector"? I couldn't find it any source for its name. Thanks.

I made a typo in both the comment and the source. The correct URL is changeset/176165267.

Alright, will do!

Oh, okay. Should I delete this polygon, too?

Oh, okay. In that case, should I just delete these "new" freeways since, according to you, they're just temporary?

Alright, I guess that makes sense. But here's the thing: I'm not actually sure if any of the new roads I just mapped are temporary or not (with respect to the construction timeline). The random track road I created linking Summerlin Parkway westbound to the freeway link is temporary for sure, but I'm not 100% sure if the "new" one-lane freeways that parallel the 215 are just temporary road construction bypasses or are indicative of a new project, such as "local" and "express" lanes, similar to what California does with its Interstates.

Oh, alright then. I guess I'll just have to wait then.