Fizzie-DWG's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 161007288 | 6 months ago | DWG revert - invalid deletion of names in different languages |
| 161007157 | 6 months ago | DWG revert - invalid deletion of names in different languages |
| 161007025 | 6 months ago | DWG revert - invalid deletion of names in different languages |
| 161006989 | 6 months ago | DWG revert - invalid deletion of names in different languages |
| 161006803 | 6 months ago | DWG revert - invalid deletion of names in different languages |
| 161006732 | 6 months ago | DWG revert - invalid deletion of names in different languages |
| 161006607 | 6 months ago | DWG revert - invalid deletion of names in different languages |
| 161004684 | 6 months ago | DWG revert - invalid deletion of names in different languages |
| 161004644 | 6 months ago | DWG revert - invalid deletion of names in different languages |
| 161004520 | 6 months ago | DWG revert - invalid deletion of names in different languages |
| 161004252 | 6 months ago | DWG revert - invalid deletion of names in different languages |
| 161003749 | 6 months ago | DWG revert - invalid deletion of names in different languages |
| 161003651 | 6 months ago | DWG revert - invalid deletion of names in different languages |
| 168228436 | 6 months ago | Please see osm.org/user_blocks/18398 |
| 168204830 | 6 months ago | Please see osm.org/user_blocks/18395 |
| 167862221 | 6 months ago | Yes, OK, but if you do this, then please mark the source on your edits as "survey" as well as aerial imagery. |
| 167862221 | 6 months ago | Thanks, but due to the terms of their licence, we are unable to use any Google mapping product for editing in OSM. In this case,I will have to ask you to immediately revert any edits you have made in this way. |
| 167862221 | 6 months ago | Hello Storgar. Could you please tell us your source for adding these house-numbers? You've only listed Bing Aerial imagery which naturally doesn't show them! Thanks,
|
| 167850114 | 6 months ago | DWG revert - deleted apparent existing features |
| 167923847 | 6 months ago | Sorry, just realised that I missed a couple of words! It should have read "please also list YOUR SOURCE as survey & local knowledge, as well as aerial imagery", which makes a lot more sense! I also misunderstood what you meant when you referred to those websites - I thought you were mapping by copying from them. As you aren't, everything is fine! Please keep on doing what you're doing & have fun mapping! :-) |