Sure I'll remove name=Colton Lane beyond that point. In 9,856 changesets, mistakes will inevitably be made, doesn't mean I'm not mapping in good faith - I believe I am. If issues are raised I am open to correcting them.

The A659 beyond the A64 sliproads seems to be quite clearly Leeds Road, going off of OS OpenMap and google. Before the construction of the bypass this would've been the A64. I figure the name would continue to meet York Road at the original Bramham Crossroads (next to the Crossroads Farm), which has moved to accommodate the A1(M). These together appear to date back as Roman roads. I think we can agree that this stretch of the A64 existed before the Tadcaster Bypass, likely not as a dual carriageway. I'm not of the mind that it would've lost its name by becoming a dual carriageway.

The classes of roads on OSM in the UK is determined by the technical classification of the road (i.e. blue signs = motorway, green signs = trunk/primary route, white = non-primary A-road), not by the importance or nature of the road.

In what way were the exit names misleading?

The crossing crossing the road and the node which brought the path to the south across some more roads

Connected the crossing way to the road, returned a random node that seemed to have been accidentally dragged over to the south. To be honest this was the bare minimum on my part.

A restriction tagged on a node + a nonexistent no-right-turn. Replaced with a no-left-turn and some no-u-turns

Sure. I haven't changed any tagging for more "specialised" signals though.

Hadn't seen it.

I read the wiki. The meaning of "signal" is as opposed to alternatives such as crossing. Sure, the suggested tagging includes crossing=no, keep it if you like it. Crossings aren't implied by highway=traffic_signals.

Hi

I don't see where brands factor in here. Has construction started on this section of road recently?

^^^ 'Sankey Brook Navigation' seems to be a relic of the past used in initial development and construction - may better suit project_name.

Never mind I just read the wiki page

There is an island between the crossings

Hi,

Naming junctions with a junction=yes node is typically only reserved for crossroads. Circulatory junctions and roundabouts are pretty much universally mapped by naming the junction's roadway.

The boundary is where the fence is.

It's separated by a lot more than that, including a few meters vertically. It may run parallel but it's a functionally independent path.

End of route signs are advisory and are only legally enforceable in such case as they're explaining somewhere cycling is prohibited by law anyway.

I'm not suggesting they cycle. I'm suggesting they are allowed to make the connection to fearnhead lane. Otherwise the cycleways either side are entirely redundant.

Bicycles aren't prohibited though? Can you cite any source for this that applies in this instance?

If you want I can go and photograph tomorrow. Clearly you don't value anything I say