Please stop renaming junctions to carry the name of the through-route. Standard practice is to either tag the junction name or noname=yes on the way.

Hi, can you explain how this regards brands?

What made you delete the names from the exit nodes?

The junction is named in https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/2639/pdfs/uksi_20132639_en.pdf

At the very least I think it should be tagged under official_name

Also added fences, abandoned but still present sliproads

Also added + tagged alleys

Also added crossing tags, signals

I've seen a lot of crossings with differing tagging specifically in London, namely crossing=traffic_signals on nodes and crossing=marked on ways and it seems to be a result of your edits.

crossing=traffic_signals is the most accepted way of tagging signalised crossings in the UK both on the node and the way. Why don't you match the tagging between the node and the way?

The currently accepted tagging for busways is highway=busway and highway=residential is definitely incorrect. Whether or not a feature renders on OSM carto, features should be tagged correctly and not however looks nicest. See osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Nah it's the renderer. The new busway tagging has only recently been adopted and hasn't yet been incorporated by OSM Carto. highway=busway is definitely the current tagging scheme - see highway=busway

If you search "Golden Valley Bypass" you can find lots of articles and other sites referencing the "A40 Golden Valley Bypass," and with there being a B4063 Gloucester/Cheltenham Road via Golden Valley, it makes sense you'd call it that. OS may not recognise the name but it certainly is used.

OS OpenMap says the name is Roman Road, do you think that would be a suitable change?

Sure I'll remove name=Colton Lane beyond that point. In 9,856 changesets, mistakes will inevitably be made, doesn't mean I'm not mapping in good faith - I believe I am. If issues are raised I am open to correcting them.

The A659 beyond the A64 sliproads seems to be quite clearly Leeds Road, going off of OS OpenMap and google. Before the construction of the bypass this would've been the A64. I figure the name would continue to meet York Road at the original Bramham Crossroads (next to the Crossroads Farm), which has moved to accommodate the A1(M). These together appear to date back as Roman roads. I think we can agree that this stretch of the A64 existed before the Tadcaster Bypass, likely not as a dual carriageway. I'm not of the mind that it would've lost its name by becoming a dual carriageway.

The classes of roads on OSM in the UK is determined by the technical classification of the road (i.e. blue signs = motorway, green signs = trunk/primary route, white = non-primary A-road), not by the importance or nature of the road.

In what way were the exit names misleading?

The crossing crossing the road and the node which brought the path to the south across some more roads

Connected the crossing way to the road, returned a random node that seemed to have been accidentally dragged over to the south. To be honest this was the bare minimum on my part.

A restriction tagged on a node + a nonexistent no-right-turn. Replaced with a no-left-turn and some no-u-turns

Sure. I haven't changed any tagging for more "specialised" signals though.