FTA_dwg_archived's Comments

Changeset	When	Comment
36746519	almost 10 years ago	Reverted in changeset/36782152
36746591	almost 10 years ago	Reverted in changeset/36782152
36746608	almost 10 years ago	Reverted in changeset/36782152
36746623	almost 10 years ago	Reverted in changeset/36782152
36746765	almost 10 years ago	Reverted in changeset/36782152
36746790	almost 10 years ago	Reverted in changeset/36782152
36746872	almost 10 years ago	Reverted in changeset/36782152
36746894	almost 10 years ago	Reverted in changeset/36782152
36746998	almost 10 years ago	Reverted in changeset/36782152
36747030	almost 10 years ago	Reverted in changeset/36782152
36747092	almost 10 years ago	Reverted in changeset/36782152
36747235	almost 10 years ago	Reverted in changeset/36782152
29257069	almost 11 years ago	Hi Walter, Thanks for getting back to me...it is greatly appreciated. Unfortunately, an article on Spiegel Online is not an OSM-compatible source to derive data from. Unless you refer to a different Spiegel, these changes will have to be redacted. Please see http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Contributor_Terms_Summary for more information.
29257069	almost 11 years ago	Hi there, I noticed you made these edits but did not list a source. Could you please elaborate on where you obtained this information? I cannot seem to discern any of these features on Bing imagery.
29149030	almost 11 years ago	I have removed the coastline because this was added over the coastline/reef you had previously deleted that was already present in the location. I am leaving the airport for now to give you the benefit of the doubt as to the source. Could you please elaborate on it? Thanks, FTA
29149030	almost 11 years ago	Hi there, I noticed you added a few features here with a source of Bing. Unfortunately, the current Bing imagery does not point to an airport feasibly existing at this location. Have you personally visited this airport, or did you acquire this information from a data source that has released its data under compatible terms with OSM's license? Either way, could you in the future include that source with the changeset and use a more meaningful changeset comment? It's hard for fellow mappers to dissect what is being mapped without a description. --FTA