Shouldn't it have man_made=water_works?

@Sergio Zara: are you talking about way/27508529? You can turn it into highway=service access=private if you're sure. I don't understand why you're commenting this changeset, all I did here was removing some advertising rubbish 8 months ago.

Reverted in 42900247.

The only thing you did in this (your first) changeset was changing the relation's type from administrative boundary to multipolygon. Is it not an administrative area any more? I'm reverting this change for now.

Same for Ventspils (93906).

Why removing administrative boundary tags from Havana (relation/5252057)? Please respond.

Is Río Cuarto (relation/3921415) not an administrative entity anymore? If it's true, why do you leave admin_level=8?

Es dauert aber noch wohl Monate, bis dieser Abschnitt der Trippstadter Straße wieder beidseitig befahrbar wird. Die neueste Position dieser Ersatzhaltestelle scheint am logischsten (von der Haltestelle Richtung stadtauswärts sichtbar) und möge so dauerhaft bleiben.

Dlaczego zamieniasz addr:city na jakiś "addr:place_1"?

Why deleting line 388075488, boundary segment between "RW 06" and "RW 11"? You left both boundary relations broken. I'm undeleting it now.

Please don't tinker with relations if you don't know what you're doing. By adding meadows to the relation, you broke the boundary of Хмельницький, I'm fixing it now. Also, please write meaningful changeset comments!

Super informacje, ale "Budynek mieszkalny" to nie jest odpowiednia "nazwa" dla budynków mieszkalnych. building=residential (albo house, albo apartments) wystarczy.

"Sklep" też powinien być oznaczony jakimś shop=*. Pomogę, tylko proszę powiedzieć: Co ten sklep sprzedaje?

You removed admin_level=8 from Fiesso d'Artico (relation/44985). Is this place really not of any admin_level, or is it your mistake?

Please do not join river segments if they are members of different boundary relations. In this edit, you broke a handful boundaries, like Escaudes and Lerm-et-Musset. I'm fixing them now.

Alles klar, ich dachte dass du es zufällig übersehen hast. Vielen Dank für deine Arbeit, es ist sehr wichtig für die Qualität der Daten :)

Why deleting type=boundary boundary=administrative from Canedo (4192922)? I'm fixing it now.

AL5 Urambo (1600828) ist immer noch offen, trotzdem es in "Countries Compare" als "fixed" steht.

When splitting boundary lines in JOSM, remember to always download them with their surroundings, so that all parent relations get loaded. In this changeset, you broke multiple boundary relations:
https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/index.php/10-osm-reports/656-countries-compare-2016-08-17
I'm fixing them now.

You did not. Why deleting type=boundary boundary=administrative from Kejžlice?

Is there really a viewpoint for tourists?