Hi. Thanks for your contribution.

You seem to have deleted many things here. As you stated, you are "in progress", so you are replacing those, right?

Please bear in mind that deleting and replacing is not really the same as just changing the existing.

Changing the existing and keeping the history is important, please always try to do that.

Thank you for your understanding.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117755142

Found this right before me. You using OSMCha too?

Have a good one, bro, see ya around.

Thank you.

Ok, vielen Dank für die Info.

Good thing I don't know how to play golf. See you around someday!

You seem to like reverting stuff. Would you like to join my secret society? If so, please PM me.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117712263

Hi. Thank you for your contribution.

Are all the buildings you deleted really gone? Does not seem lik that from the aerial imagery.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117724140

Thank you.

I really wonder if the person that did is is asleep right now.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117728264

This never was a good idea.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110238771

Allright, thank you.

nice work, just came in here to say, damn that aerial imagery here looking CRISPPPPP
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117730248

Kinda depends on opinion and regional consensus. Not wrong either way.

Though previous mapper forgot to add cycleway=seperate.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117732736

Thank you, i really dont know what the heck is up with golfers on OSM, currently.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117737811

Mostly good, though it seems some DID exist, being just not residential, but track. Could you please double-check?
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117748259

bruh, you dont even get paid for this

#2: Thanks for your contributions. Are the deletions of name and destination:ref tags intentional?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117748651

Hi Casper,

What a surprise, seeing you here!

This is my first session ever validating stuff using OSMCha. Didn't even realize this was your edit at first, just saw "User has multiple blocks".

I trust you enough to mark this edit GOOD without even checking.

Greets,
Emilius
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117721344

bruh, osmcha reported this for iD instance, mapbox really tryna hide yo iD there, bro
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117734606

No need to apologize, thank you for the quick fix!

Hi,

Good thing on you checking inaccurate data, but could you please draw a new residential landuse, then? An inaccurate one is better than none.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117741634