Elian D's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 145693993 | almost 2 years ago | Pressed "Enter" too soon: Remove redundant name="Bloc" for apartment block |
| 137416482 | about 2 years ago | Thank you as well! |
| 124826862 | about 2 years ago | Thank you for the information, @rarad74. I was able to find the sign as well and it does say "C.V.A Centru Nord" without any other prefix such as "Str." (although I haven't come across this prefix before). In this case the name is fully correct. |
| 124826862 | about 2 years ago | @rarad74, could you please confirm the name of this road? way/26518188 What does C.V.A. in „C.V.A. Centru Nord” stand for? |
| 137416482 | about 2 years ago | @ibz, could you please confirm the name of this street? Is it „Strada Bulucești” or does the name mean something else? I was unable to find the street name through other means. |
| 145119399 | about 2 years ago | @PLGedit, in node/11417766348 you have added a `place=village` with the name "Gáborok pataka". Can you please confirm the existence of this village? I was not able to identify it. Also the name translated with Google Translate is "Gáborok stream" (doesn't sound like the name of a village). In the meantime I've downgraded it to a `place=hamlet` since I don't think it's an official location. |
| 131571437 | about 2 years ago | @GBAB, thank you for the detailed information and sorry for the delayed response. If I understood correctly, we have: The Commune (contains both villages): Plăieșii de Jos / Kászon
From your links, I believe there is only one thing to address: the link to the commune should not be node/460203951 since that refers to the Node corresponding to the Southern part (note place=village). The commune itself is actually the parent relationship relation/14879161#map=11/46.2352/26.1358 (place=municipality). And it has the proper name. In this case, I believe the node node/10574578601 should be deleted since we already have the node for the southern part (node/460203951). I've removed the node node/10574578601 in changeset/145420155 and applied the name change to the village node. The whole goal of this would be not to have another place node (with only name:hu since I believe we already have the nodes + relationships for all three entities). Let me know if you agree with this change or if we need to discuss it. |
| 142632580 | about 2 years ago | Source: https://iemi.uoradea.ro/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Harta-Campus-scaled.jpg |
| 142158725 | about 2 years ago | osm.wiki/Mechanical_Edits/ElianD/Improve_street_prefixes_in_Romania |
| 142155948 | about 2 years ago | The reasoning behind this is that the street names were imported from another data source, but the name of the street does not fit any other map or street imagery. Maybe the name was added in the input dataset because there was no way to mark the street as not having a name; in OSM, we can. |
| 142108686 | about 2 years ago | See changeset/142108686 for more info. |
| 124815504 | about 2 years ago | @gisbihor, some of the nodes such as node/9949195354 have a "null" value for "fire_hydrant:position" and "fire_hydrant:pressure". Is this normal? |
| 131571437 | about 2 years ago | @GBAB, can you please confirm the role of this `place=village`: node/10574578601 It seems quite close to node/460203951. Not sure that I can understand the difference between "Kászon" and "Kászonaltíz". |
| 141997108 | about 2 years ago | See osm.wiki/Mechanical_Edits/ElianD/Improve_street_prefixes_in_Romania for more info. |
| 141996954 | about 2 years ago | See osm.wiki/Mechanical_Edits/ElianD/Improve_street_prefixes_in_Romania for more info. |
| 141996846 | about 2 years ago | See osm.wiki/Mechanical_Edits/ElianD/Improve_street_prefixes_in_Romania for more info. |
| 141996723 | about 2 years ago | See osm.wiki/Mechanical_Edits/ElianD/Improve_street_prefixes_in_Romania for more info. |
| 141996565 | about 2 years ago | See osm.wiki/Mechanical_Edits/ElianD/Improve_street_prefixes_in_Romania for more info. |
| 140029023 | over 2 years ago | I believe the park boundary (way/1198775808) overlaps with way/1198775808. Should we correct that? |
| 139823171 | over 2 years ago | Buenas tardes. Gracias por su comentario. Tenga en cuenta que voy a usar Google Translate ya que no hablo español. Estaba trabajando en una campaña para agregar la wikitag de McDonald's donde fuera apropiado. Este es claramente un caso en el que no sería apropiado ya que no tiene nada que ver con la cadena. Afortunadamente, ya sabía que este no es un lugar de hamburguesas, así que agregué la etiqueta `not: brand: wikidata` en su lugar. Descripción de not:brand:wikidata=*: Una etiqueta not:brand:wikidata=* evita que se agregue por error una etiqueta brand:wikidata=* incorrecta, en particular por parte de un mapeador que responde a una herramienta de control de calidad con prisa o sin acceso a imágenes a pie de calle o conocimiento local. Entonces, en este caso, la etiqueta debe ser segura. Si aún cree que no es apropiado, hágamelo saber. |