Dinamik's Comments

Changeset	When	Comment
62129334	over 7 years ago	see comments here: changeset/62123015
62129341	over 7 years ago	see comments here: changeset/62123015
62129390	over 7 years ago	see comments here: changeset/61766931
62129400	over 7 years ago	see comments here: changeset/61766931
62129426	over 7 years ago	see comments here: changeset/61766931
62129434	over 7 years ago	see comments here: changeset/61766931
62129470	over 7 years ago	see comments here: changeset/61766931
62129480	over 7 years ago	see comments here: changeset/61766931
62129484	over 7 years ago	see comments here: changeset/61766931
62129522	over 7 years ago	see comments here: changeset/61766931
62129514	over 7 years ago	see comments here: changeset/61766931
62122202	over 7 years ago	see comments here: changeset/62123015
62123634	over 7 years ago	see comments here: changeset/62123015
62123015	over 7 years ago	Can you tolerate, that common name can be different from short name, which is used in catalogues in such form for purposes of alphabetical order and for purposes of automatisation of object analysis? Here we see, that normal name (which is normally used, for example, in rgis) is a little bit longer, than short name. It is not an issue. Why do you think, that rgis is a bad source? Is it because of rgis using of normal names?
62121899	over 7 years ago	Can you tolerate, that common name can be different from short name, which is used in catalogues in such form for purposes of alphabetical order and for purposes of automatisation of object analysis? Here we see, that normal name (which is normally used, for example, in rgis) is a little bit longer, than short name. It is not an issue. If there is nothing to discuss here, why do continue making edits, which offer objections? We have to discuss or to follow the existing rules.
62121918	over 7 years ago	Can you tolerate, that common name can be different from short name, which is used in catalogues in such form for purposes of alphabetical order and for purposes of automatisation of object analysis? Here we see, that normal name (which is normally used, for example, in rgis) is a little bit longer, than short name. It is not an issue. If there is nothing to discuss here, why do continue making edits, which offer objections? We have to discuss or to follow the existing rules.
62122016	over 7 years ago	If there is nothing to discuss here, why do continue making edits, which offer objections? We have to discuss or to follow the existing rules.
62103990	over 7 years ago	Can you tolerate, that common name can be different from short name, which is used in catalogues in such form for purposes of alphabetical order and for purposes of automatisation of object analysis? Here we see, that normal name (which is normally used, for example, in rgis) is a little bit longer, than short name. It is not an issue.
61766931	over 7 years ago	Adding of normal/common/natural name is not a tagging for render. Tag name is designated, curios to relate, for name. P. S. You wrote several hundreds comments "Edits for render" during a few hours. Shouldn't one detailed answer from human be better than several hundreds automatically written identical short phrases?
62123634	over 7 years ago	Check http://rgis.spb.ru/map/ShowPlace.aspx?id=179241 : "Наименование: Цветочный пруд". Please, stop multiply changing of names and using suppressed names.