The changeset that modified this part of the road (way/948546737) is changeset/105551345. I'm not sure why it was marked as under construction. Even if there are repair works, they shouldn't be mapped on OSM unless the road is closed for everyone for more than a month. Construction or repair works that last less then a month shouldn't be mapped.

Hello Mr_67,

Recently the river modernization has been completed in Ukraine (see osm.wiki/User:ZeLonewolf/Procedure/River_modernization). Part of it was connected with updating the river tags to the newer scheme which change was approved by the Ukrainian community. Can I ask you to use the natural=water+water=river preset for river areas in Ukraine?

Regards.
Dimitar155

Could you check way/744645610? It seems like it has some wrong tags.

Здравей Борис,
Може ли когато въвеждаш имена на улиците да не изписваш "ул." пред самото име? Пример: "ул. Снежанка" трябва да бъде "Снежанка" (разбира се без кавичките). Благодаря предварително.
Поздрави,
Димитър

This changeset was made by mistake. The actual changeset is changeset/105200232

Hello Lamia Petrica and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for mapping these buildings, but please make sure that you square their corners. You can do it by selecting the building and pressing Q on your keyboard. If you have any questions, feel free to ask.

Happy mapping,
Dimitar155

Hi DXB74,
Can you please check way/943575472? It has an empty highway tag. Thanks in advance.

Привет old wolf,

Могу я спросить, есть ли у вас какие-нибудь идеи, какие водные участки вы нанесли на карту в этой области? Заранее спасибо.

С уважением,
Dimitar155

Едва ли има паметник. Вероятно maps.me няма представа какво се случва и маркира всяко второ нещо като паметник. Същото се забелязва и в промените на потребителя. Смятам че спокойно можем да го изтрием или да оправим таговете.

The source imagery for the buildings is Bing aerial imagery.

Здравей Ники,

Не е казано че трябва да опишеш всяка подробност, но най-общо описание като "прецизиран път", "добавени имена" също би вършило работа. Важното е да е ясно какво е направено. Можеш да погледнеш моите промени в профила ми. Не винаги съм давал 100% детайлно описание, но като ги прочетеш ти става ясно какво горе-долу е било редактирано. Може да видиш тази страница (osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments) в уикито, която дава някои насоки.

Поздрави,
Митко

Здравей Ники,

Забелязах че коментарите на твоите промени по картата не са много детайлни. Например "Добавяне на подробности" или "Актуализация на данни" е твърде общо. По-добре би било да опишеш какво точно си направил. Примерно "добавена сграда", "добавени магазини", добавени данни за магазини", "редактиране на улица еди коя си". По този начин би било много по-лесно за другите хора да разберат какво точно си редактирал.

Поздрави,
Митко

You can draw the track on top of the street using the same nodes if it is a single track but I wouldn't recommend doing it since it would hide the street name behind the track and it would be hard to edit when a new line gets added. Two parallel tracks using the same nodes is also incorrect and will make it very hard to edit in the future. The best thing would be to leave them as they are. It may not be perfect but it is the best solution.

Hi judylin,

Thanks for mapping these buildings, but please make sure that you square their corners. You can do it by selecting the building and pressing Q.

Regards,
Dimitar155

I see where you are coming from but there is also another side to that statement. When you merged the two tram tracks that means that there is a single track that is used in both directions, which is incorrect in that case since there are two tracks. You can check the wiki for the right way to map tram tracks (railway=tram). The wiki is also useful when you are not sure how something should be mapped.

Hello dkaparis,

Can I ask you why you have merged the tram tracks into a single line even though there are two tracks on these streets?

Regards
Dimitar155

Hello and welcome to OSM, Mangini

It looks like you are adding building addresses but this is not the proper way. Currently you are adding tourism apartments (i.e. apartments that can be rented to tourists) which is not right. For a proper example you can check way/224329415
If you have any questions, let me know.

Cheers, Dimitar

The description should be "Added some natural areas in Lyulin 6"

If they are connected to drains, shouldn't they be tagged with waterway=ditch or waterway=drain?

It looks like the fixes have rendered. You can see them here
changeset/100541944
changeset/100544331