Hi Mlik Point. You've explicitly reverted a change to reintroduce these descriptive names. This is not correct, as discussed. The names of these streets are not as you have entered them.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125966015

Hi Mlik Point,

I noticed you are adding "descriptive names" to roads in the Melbourne Airport area.

The name field should not be used to describe what the road is or does. These roads do not have formal names and should be left unnamed.

osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

If you want to indicate where a road goes, the "destination" field is most suitable.

Dian

Hi orthogonizer,

Thank you for your contribution. In this edit, you've added a new school overlapping the existing The Alpine School at that location. I've adjusted it so that there is only one school at the location again.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125836582

Hi Melb_guy,

As discussed, we can't use the source provided to update imagery, as it is incompatible with the OSM data license.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125502208

Hi Melb_guy,

As discussed, we can't use the source provided to update imagery, as it is incompatible with the OSM data license.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125502208

Hey Map Analyser,

Where did you find the Link name from for this onramp? I can't find it in any official source :)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125478471

Hey Map Analyser,

Where did you find the Link name from for this onramp? I can't find it in any official source :)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125478471

Hey Map Analyser,

Where did you find the Link name from for this onramp? I can't find it in any official source :)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125478471

Hey Melb_Guy.

Do we have permission to be using metromap data? I don't see it on the resources page on the wiki

This edit is incorrect. There is no physical separation at Henry Street at this intersection. Further, by introducing the superfluous way you have broken the bus route relations.

I have explained, at length, why mapping lanes with no physical separation is incorrect.

Ignoring accepted mapping practice is not acceptable.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125429691

Hello,

This edit is incorrect.

As per official sources, this road segment is Old Princes Highway.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125428956

Hello,

This edit is incorrect, and results in intersecting roads at the intersection. You've also reintroduced a separate way where there is no physical separation.

I have already explained, at length in different changeset comments, why this mapping practice is not correct.

Ignoring accepting mapping practice is not acceptable.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125387104

This change is incorrect.

There is no physical separation at the service road to the west.

I have already explained, at length, the reasons why this is incorrect mapping practice on other edits.

Ignoring accepted mapping practice is not acceptable.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125389651

The way you have modelled 203222828 is wrong.

I have already explained, at length why it is wrong on previous edits. These changes are making the map functionally worse.

Please don't duplicate ways without physical separation. Wilfull disregard of accepted mapping practice is not acceptable.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125385171

Hey Warin,

I had intended to go there this week to survey the building again, but I had run out of time.

I suspect it may be a social facility or social club.

Hi Warsu. In this edit, you seem to have added duplicate tram tracks on each lane?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125161987

Hi Tashleigh. In this change, you've accidentally changed the footpath on Wellington Street to a hopscotch game. I've fixed it for you now. :)

Dian
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125139523

Hi The Crow,

You've added some content to the label node for Gisborne, but a better place for the tags would be the Gisborne relation (relation/2440055). I've moved them for you now.

Hey Bob!

I stumbled across this edit as I was going through OSMCha, and I was curious who had changed these paths to allow bikes. I couldn't see anything in the Music Bowl history that would account for this. Are you using a particular routing service to plan routes?

Dian
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125120259

No problems at all.

I would strongly caution you against using Google’s, or any other private companies, data or services when contributing to OpenStreetMap.

Google places stringent conditions for their data in their license, which makes Google data (including maps, routing, street view, etc) incompatible with OSM’s data license. osm.wiki/Google.

I’m happy to answer any questions you may have regarding licensing.

Dian