OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
145488434 over 1 year ago

Ali je node/11451459141 duplikat od node/6274575031?

146684455 almost 2 years ago

Just curious, how can one lighthouse have 63 lights such as node/1211591064?
Is that error processing data or is that real? Is there any picture of this?
Thank you,
David

145159151 almost 2 years ago

Thank you!
Is there any tool that helps with check_date? To remind you or something?

144823163 about 2 years ago

Did you delete relation/1268072 intentionally?

143564715 about 2 years ago

Hi,

could you please pay attention on direction of coastline, because currently most of islands you added in this changeset are point inward, hence they will be rendered as water and not insland.

Thank you,
David

143552192 about 2 years ago

In original comment you said that many buildings are not visible on "Bing Maps Aerial", I'm just saying they all are, I'm not saying this is good or bad source for tracing buildings.
If you load following Overpass query into JOSM and turn on Bing as imagery buildings are clearly visible:
[out:json][timeout:25];
way["building"](8.2612164,17.3854966,8.2630295,17.3875230)(newer:"2023-11-01T00:00:00Z");
(._;>;);
out skel qt;

143552192 about 2 years ago

@woodpeck I'm not sure I 100% agree, if you look closely at https://osmcha.org/changesets/143552192/
This changeset added only buildings in top right corner of changeset bounding box, not in bottom right, where buildings are bogus...
I did delete a lot of bogus buildings...

142458169 about 2 years ago

Hi,

some of islands you mapped are in wrong direction, you need to pay attention that arrows on coastline points outwards to sea.

For example this islands will not render correctly:
way/1214947354
way/1214947355
way/1214947358
way/1214947361
way/1214947363
way/1214947367

Best regrads,
David

140994303 over 2 years ago

Reverted because bad data

changeset/141208542

138882757 over 2 years ago

Hi,

looks like you deleted relation relation/3718740 that was representing Irepodun(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irepodun,_Osun).

Why was this deleted? Does it not exist anymore? Can you link to source stating this change?

Thank you,
David

138866540 over 2 years ago

Thank you for quick response, looks like relation/3718747 is missing part of polygon and relation/3718729 has that part extra.

Do you want to fix this or should I?

Thank you,
David

138866540 over 2 years ago

Hi,

looks like multiple boundaries were broken in process of editing, can you try correcting them to form polygon again?
List of broken boundaries:
Osun State - relation/3718720
Irepodun - relation/3718740
Olorunda - relation/3718747
Oyo State - relation/3720554
Surulere - relation/3720587

Thank you,
David

138511150 over 2 years ago

Hi,

I noticed that you added to many relations relation/1953566 as member relation.
But didn't set member Type(outer, subarea...).
Was this intentional addition? If so, can you set member type if not, can you remove relation/1953566 from other relations membership?

Thank you,
David

138337817 over 2 years ago

Can you explain and give more details why you changed from admin_level=7 to admin_level=5? If this is intentional change, can you also update other relations on admin_level=7 and admin_level=5 to not overlap/create holes?

changeset/138365283

138310946 over 2 years ago

Reverted this change to bring back Amazonas as admin_level=4 admin of Brazil

changeset/138361054

136113706 over 2 years ago

Hi,
awesome stuff fixing all this admins, I'm seeing this 3 relations are left unfinished, do you maybe have enough knowledge to fix them?
relation/10389352
relation/10389353
relation/10389875

Thank you!

136056205 over 2 years ago

Hi,

what is reason for removing boundary=administrative tag from this relation, it seems perfectly valid tag to have on this relation?

Thank you,
David

135761116 over 2 years ago

This has broken many relations, including Argentina and Paraguay, can you fix it?
Thank you

135741265 over 2 years ago

Hi,

it looks like relations relation/14772103 and relation/3203339 got broken by this change.

Can you try to connect them back together?
Thank you,
David

131483143 over 2 years ago

name:zh tag on relation/13824732 seems to have accidental content, was that intentional?