DaveF's Comments

Changeset	When	Comment
97501960	almost 5 years ago	Hi Welcome to OSM Could you provide a more descriptive changeset comment than "made changes"? Something like 'NCN 4 route amended due to...' You've created a separate cycleway: osm.org /way/680909013 Is the route not shared path at this point? It's created a gap in the route which requires fixing: http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=1318929 Is there a reason the route can't continue on the pavement to the West of Chelsea Bridge until it reaches one of the pedestrian crossings?
97946315	almost 5 years ago	This section should be part of relation/1318928 You've added it to the super relation/1318931 which should only contain other relations.
97993748	almost 5 years ago	What proof have you that there are toilets other than disabled at the locations you've amended? You didn't conclude the discussion on this subject on Talk:GB.
87794688	almost 5 years ago	Hi What were you attempt to achieve with this changeset? This was removed: way/600468563
90791106	almost 5 years ago	Same Q as before.
90791047	almost 5 years ago	Hi What landuse is it? Yes isn't detailed enough.
65010430	almost 5 years ago	What are these? way/650647038
97788543	almost 5 years ago	If there's no vehicle access, it's not a service road anymore.
97767536	almost 5 years ago	Hi Don't delete valid data. node/6606087122
67760238	almost 5 years ago	Hi Pretty sure they're not based on the platform. Where's the accurate position for them?
97409102	almost 5 years ago	Hi Tourist railway stations are not public_transport. Please don't click iD editor's validation/resolve button without comprehending the circumstances.
78408254	almost 5 years ago	http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-2.33890&lat=51.37624&zoom=9
78408254	almost 5 years ago	Hi could you take another look at your multipolygon relation. It's far too complicated . relation/10409324 osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon
97292464	almost 5 years ago	Again, please don't change foot=designated to foot=yes on PROW footpaths. It reduces the quality of the OSM database.
97177021	almost 5 years ago	way/168554853 This too large for a pitch (bordered with white lines). Please don't assume iD editor is factually correct.
97162006	almost 5 years ago	Please don't change foot=designated to foot=yes. It reduces the quality of the OSM database.
97128484	almost 5 years ago	Thanks for spotting that & letting me know. Now deleted.
97048261	almost 5 years ago	Please don't remove area tags from railway=platform mapped as polygons. They're a required tag.
10413988	almost 5 years ago	Hi Neil https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/4002666 Could you clarify the name of the tunnel structure? Even if it has a name, the road's name should still be Hotwells.
93241467	almost 5 years ago	I've fixed a few in the area, but may take a while to rerender