OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
89450963 over 5 years ago

Hi
You've created two duplicate stations:
node/3913898919#map=18/53.68227/-1.50551
node/26152985#map=18/53.68230/-1.50536

89363793 over 5 years ago

Does QEW (west) still have shared pavements?

89054071 over 5 years ago

Sorry for the delay.
Surface tags can be added to the crossing nodes.
If the highway was mapped as a polygon, showing explicit width, then the crossings should be mapped linearly & I'd have removed the nodes.

89287258 over 5 years ago

Hi
I assume this is meant to be something other than a station?
node/7805862411#map=19/52.35844/-1.87426

89200604 over 5 years ago

Please hold steady.
Your edits are duplicating data. ie There is an existing track here: way/835776031#map=16/53.5706/-2.4225
And there are two station nodes. Please revert this changeset

PS Level=0 is redundant as objects without it are assumed to be at that level.

88801122 over 5 years ago

Hi
What 'usage' is this station. Looks heritage/tourism given the rolling stock.
node/7272762973

89054071 over 5 years ago

Here's a simple example:
http://tile.openstreetmap.fr/?zoom=20&lat=49.01049&lon=8.3876&layers=B0000000FFFFFF

Note it even rotates to align with the road.

89054071 over 5 years ago

Hi
Yes. They're duplicating Duplicating data leads to confusion & errors.There are already crossing nodes on the road centre-line.
The centre-line represents the full road width. Addition tags such as ref or the explicit 'width' indicate, to renderers, how wide the road should be displayed. The node on the way already represents the full width of the road.

89043544 over 5 years ago

It's seems strange they'd render at node points. Split them to see if it sorts it. Ta.

88632036 over 5 years ago

Can you show me where it flags railway=platform?

Please don't remove any more as it was clearly an error.

88632036 over 5 years ago

Hi
What osmose setting flagged up that 'area' show be removed from:
way/152107575 ?

86368893 over 5 years ago

Hi
Yes, that's one of the reasons I contacted you.
if you can find the relevant data set here, you're a better man than I.
https://data.gov.uk/dataset/b33423d0-2df7-4a34-8e4e-4ad927963a54/pembrokeshire-coast-national-park-gis-boundary

86368893 over 5 years ago

Hi
Could you have a check/clarify your edits please. There's a gap in the Pembrokeshire Coast NP relation:

relation/165598#map=17/51.65167/-4.72190

https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=86368893

88557943 over 5 years ago

Hi
Is there a reason you deleted this station node?
node/7352766757/history#map=18/55.69404/-3.86102

88314792 over 5 years ago

Hi
I was aware it's location, I was check to see if you'd mre detail than a guess from serial imagery.
Is it a place where MoD personnel currently board a train?
If it is disused it shouldn't be tagged as a train station

88314792 over 5 years ago

Hi
What details d you have of this being a railway station?

way/133079079

87857456 over 5 years ago

Seeing that both I & Peter have made further amendments to some of these entities it's probably easier to change manually.

87917789 over 5 years ago

https://lmgtfy.com/?q=Dial-a-Ride+

87991955 over 5 years ago

Hi
Is there a reason you removed leisure=recreation_ground?

87622628 over 5 years ago

FYI
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/W4G