Seriously?
I asked about the current validity of one of your edits. I 'pointed it out as the specific thing that needed changing' using well known & popular OSM validating software. You then criticized me for asking. How am I meant to interpret that other than "rude"?

OSM contributors will always be contacting you to ensure the OSM is as accurate as possible. They will use the software provided, whether you interpret as "creepy", "weird" or "stalkerish", or not. Please get used to it.

I don't know why you querying my question. Your edit of that node clearly shows it as a railway station under CONSTRUCTION.

Why are you unable to read accurately?

Hi
Is this still happening?

https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/2415734885

Hi
node/181310448
Do you have any current details of this? Is it still on the books?

Hi
What's a "service_station"?

"what is the definition of a halt in the UK "
Well, as pointed out in the newsgroup thread, no one really knows/agrees. For the NR stations 'Halt' other than literally 'stop' is so vague it leads to confusion & false data. I believe having all as railway=station, even down to the miniature, consolidates the info. Clearer subtags (such as request_stop) can be added to improve quality if required. I'm considering something like station=miniature to coincide with rail=miniature tag on the tracks.

As you may have noticed even these tourist routes are inconsistently & randomly tagged with a mixture of stations & halts.

Well,can't you amend them to how i said as your amendments are half right?

Hi
Version 4:
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/220857485

Re: names: I'm unsure what you mean. Bridges of all types should have their name tagged using bridge:name for the reason I gave.
Example:
way/148028614
You've swapped the name of the road for the bridge name. That section of road now has no name.

Hi
Is there a reason you added tunnel?
way/220857485

'name' should not be used on bridges as they can clash with highway names:
bridge:name=*

I know. As I indicated in my first post. That doesn't make it a tunnel. It is still a bridge structure

covered=*
or
bridge=covered

Hi
Why have you tag it as both bridge & tunnel? These are clearly in confliction.
If the railway passes above the water line it is still a bridge, even if it's covered.

Is this really scrub?
way/693638094#map=19/53.52761/-2.48988

Sort of.Please have a read of this thread (it continues into Feb)
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2020-January/024096.html

Basically 'halt' is to ambiguous/subjective.
I've change all the commercial stations to 'stations'. I'm working my way through tourist lines. Every halt already has a usage=tourist tag & I'm adding the specific 'request_stop=yes' where I can find appropriate data. (I'm emailing them to find out if it isn't obvious). It makes little difference in any of the main renderings.

OK; what should it be called?
What are "relief lines"
Doesn't the Great Western Main Line also carry freight & other services?
How should that be renamed?

No
There should only be one railway=station, but there can be multiple building=train_stations, per station.

See also multiple building=school objects within one school site.

Could you check please. i think you added the incorrect Glanyrafon wiki tags.

Thanks. Done

Hi
building=train_station

Hi
What is "Cup of Tea"
Cafe?

Please don't add railway=station tags to buildings. There are already station nodes.