Adding superfluous ref:crs tags "skews the data" . In this instance - for the router.

Cheers

Hi
Amenity=park is incorrect. but what is it?

highway=ford is deprecated for ford=yes

node/7052051329

node/7187240576#map=18/54.06513/-2.16555

highway=ford is deprecated for ford=yes

Ta

Great. Thanks

osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Hi
I think railway=stop + the relevant NapTAN stop position code is what should be added.
osm.wiki/NaPTAN#NaPTAN

The correct term is tagging *incorrectly* to suit the renderer. Positioning nodes so valid data can display isn't incorrect.See village place names as an example. It's a bit awkward because the platforms are askew but somewhere half way between the two on railway land is fine for the station node.

Hi
As you've deleted the bridge over Kingham Station how do passengers get to the opposite platform?
Are you sure the footpath here no longer exists?osm.org/go/eunyG79Mw--?m=

Hi Mark
Why have you deleted this landuse polygon?
If it's owned/used by a railway company for 'railway' purposes then it's a valid addition to OSM.
if the area demarcated is inaccurate then it should be amended, not removed.

Hi Brian
There should only be one ref:crs per station & it should be on the railway=station node.
It's best to position that node away from the station building to allow its name & other facilities to render & display.

If you spot any of my errors, let me know & I'll fix them.

The node in the channel is still there.

Looking at the various aerial images there appears to be a segregated path to the rear of the platform. I'd be surprised if it didn't route along it.

way/463238230

You added tags to the way:
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/463238230

Hi
Is there a physical raised platform here or is it a goods yard where containers are unloaded?

way/553782360#map=18/53.50504/-2.17914&layers=N

way/776060284#map=15/52.0932/-2.6150
If this is accessible to motor vehicles it's not a footway. Please have a read of wiki, specifically: highway=*?uselang=en

Hi
Welcome to OSM
Are you sure this is a footpath: it passes through a residential property.
way/692972623#map=17/51.98309/-2.62229.

Hi
Could double check this please:
relation/1277566#map=14/51.4982/-2.5902

Hi
Which wiki page specifically?