OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
80102094 almost 6 years ago

Hi
You've added a duplicating railway station even though there's an existing one directly adjacent.

78503189 almost 6 years ago

Hi
There's already a railway=station node so deleting duplicates from building.

80160043 almost 6 years ago

Hi
please be aware there is already a railway station:
node/6022637124

railway=station should be separate from building=train-station as it prevents rendering of its name.

79950097 almost 6 years ago

Thanks you for replying. I believe the work Amazon logistics are performing adds good detail to the map in areas not accessible to the general public. We all make occasional errors.

80050514 almost 6 years ago

Hi again
I've just noticed you've deleted a stop area relation for the London Underground network. This is a separate network to the National Rail & London Overground networks.

Why have you merged them?

80050567 almost 6 years ago

There are two Wembley Central Stations for different networks. This node is a separate stations in its own right.
node/10287073/history
Please reinstated the deleted tags

80050514 almost 6 years ago

Hi
Why have to deleted the vital railway=station tag from node/10287073/history

https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=80050514

Why have you also deleted the wiki tags?

64974549 almost 6 years ago

Hi
I'm struggling to see the point of this tag. If a renderer ignores nodes they'll ignore a node with this tag on it.
Which "map processing applications" do what you claim?

79921366 almost 6 years ago

Thanks.

79950097 almost 6 years ago

Hi
I've reverted your changset as the bollards are often removed to allow vehicle access when other entrance is blocked due to filming, concerts etc.

79805724 almost 6 years ago

Hi
There can't really be a situation where there's both a bridge & tunnel as you've mapped here:
way/765173089#map=19/51.46054/-0.98605

This section was already tagged accurately as a bridge so I'm unsure why you amended it?:
way/765173085#map=19/51.46150/-0.99358

Although you didn't create it, this doesn't need to be a bridge. From the aerial imagery it appears the road is passing through the supports of the viaduct
way/319282697

79325374 almost 6 years ago

Hi
You doubled up on platforms here:
relation/10556134#map=19/55.81009/-4.27377

There's no need to add highway=footway to platforms as there primary purpose is for people to walk on them - it's implied.

73666353 almost 6 years ago

@Someone Else
I updated the other National Parks recently & the world appears to still be turning. I think the primary tag to cover all, & then sub-tag to list specific types is a much more adaptable schema. It's similar to 'natural=water, water=*' although I think protected_area=*' would have been more desirable than 'designation=*'
I've tweaked your OP query to include 'national_scenic_area' which is specific to Scotland
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/PSI

I'm unsure why the some of the designation values are capitalized with spaces. OSM convention is, unless they were names, they should be lowercase & underscored. I think they should be converted.

77448235 almost 6 years ago

You removed a school tag:
way/211819343
And you've created a second 'Twickenham Stadium' label

I believe it would be easier to revert this changeset.

77448235 almost 6 years ago

Hi
You've removed a primary tag describing what it was, but not replaced it with any alternative. Most are redrawing them as polygons tagged with landuse=farmyard.
node/3167602235

Why have you changed this from a bus stop to railway station?
node/469767962

Again you've removed a primary tag & not replaced it. Plus you've added an unnecessary area tag.
way/318520476

Is The Palm Centre the actual name of the wood or a shop?
way/617620272

You've misspelt Twickenham plus there's already a Twickenham Stoop Stadium tag
way/326021744

79491930 almost 6 years ago

Hi
Thanks for the notes on colour.

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/PLB
It's lead to situation of there now being at least 18 different relations for NCN 1 (and that excludes links (1)). It's lead to error & confusion Note how their tags vary. One of the main reasons for the introduction of relations was to easily tag it once & apply to the whole relation. Some are nested 3 deep (1992599 > 75880 > 10564435) I'm unaware of the benefits of that.

I see no advantage in alternate routes being given unique relations.

79491930 almost 6 years ago

Hi Mac'
Could you clarify the significance of the colours tag?

You've created new NCN 1 relations. What is their purpose?

17123324 almost 6 years ago

Hi
Quite a while ago it appears you created a polygon city boundary around Carlisle. Can you remember what it was based on? Other administration boundaries, perhaps?
way/231549499/history

Cheers
DaveF

78745325 almost 6 years ago

Hi again
A small problem You tagged the new sections of NCN4 with 'super relation' relation/1318931

This contains the three main routes, split to make them more manageable. Most websites would time out when trying to list each way.

The one you require is 'Western 1318930'
relation/1318930

78745325 almost 6 years ago

Thanks Owain
I removed a couple of sections under the road A4223 that still had NCN4 references.

I'm confused by your 3rd point. It's this path, highlighted white, that I'm talking about.
https://snipboard.io/mJlvO5.jpg https://snipboard.io/mJlvO5.jpg
http://tinyurl.com/sosg5ub

Roads with restricted vehicle access are best tagged with:
access=*#Access_time_and_other_conditional_restrictions
How many bike racks are there? If there are four, the capacity should be doubled to eight.