OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
74402692 about 6 years ago

Hi
relation/28951
FYI 'riverbank' tag is considered a bit out of date.
water=*#Natural_features
natural=water & water=river fit better with other water features.

77319457 about 6 years ago

Hi
There's no requirement for explicit bicycle=yes on trunk roads.

76576604 about 6 years ago

Hi
Is there a reason you removed 'driveway'?
way/18936192

73729549 about 6 years ago

But you added that section. You can't use your own edit as justification. Where was this discussed?

A router must know the name of the station it's at so it doesn't need to be add to the platform.

There is a claim that name is required at all (it certainly isn't Mandatory as listed in that wiki page). All that's really required if the ref number/letter.

If a renderer wants to expand the platform's label they can take the ref & prefix it with 'Platform' etc.

73729549 about 6 years ago

Hi
Is there a specific, necessary reason you've added station names to platform names?
Was it discussed on a forum?

76275917 about 6 years ago

Re: snarky:
I wish to maintain the OSM database so it can be as accurate as possible. Adding inaccurate data does not do that.
I'm irritated by the number of times I'm asked by contributors to clear up their mistakes. OSM is a do-ology. Those who created an error should clear it up.

You created both relations:
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/10218025
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/10218026

Does Watercress Farm not exist any more?

76275917 about 6 years ago

If you don't understand about multipolygon relations please refrain from using them.
Details con be found here:
osm.wiki/Relation#Multipolygon

76275917 about 6 years ago

Hi
You've still created a pointless relation. I it only has one member it is unnecessary. It should just be a way.

76232319 about 6 years ago

Hi Could you clarify why you've created two identical relations, both of which have only one member - an outer?

76061329 about 6 years ago

Hi again
There's no need for the negating tags as highway=footway already excludes

76061329 about 6 years ago

Hi
Are you absolutely sure that's a designated *public* footpath? It doesn't say so on the signs.
osm.wiki/Access_provisions_in_the_United_Kingdom#Public_footpaths

76059648 about 6 years ago

Hi
The name of the street is Calverton St.
The name of the terraced buildings are Widcombe Parade, Claverton Buildings, Sussex Place etc.

76021059 about 6 years ago

FYI
references should be tagged as 'ref' or 'prow_ref; if an English designated public footpath not 'name'.

69408231 about 6 years ago

Hi
way/291615512
Do you remember if the sign designated it as a *public* footpath?

76020844 about 6 years ago

Hi
FP 170 is not the path's name. Please use prow_ref if it's the local authority's official reference.

36716510 about 6 years ago

Hi
Do you know if this footpath is still closed?
way/67244091

31596215 about 6 years ago

Ah ,FFS! I can't win with some on OSM. Check with them to make sure any changes are accurate & I get this kind of reply. Don't inform them & they cry like big girls blouses.

Unlike some I could mention I take time to ensure my contributions are as accurate as possible

31596215 about 6 years ago

Hi
The Great Eastern Main Line is still a part of National Rail network I believe .

31596215 about 6 years ago

Hi
Do you remember why you amended 'network' from National Rail to TFL Rail?

73568386 about 6 years ago

Hi
Why have you split trains station into two separate objects with duplicating tags?