OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
65031668 about 7 years ago

You could have used the 'straight ahead only' rule. 4 rels instead of 8.

64973426 about 7 years ago

Open to persuasion, but they have separate CRS & NapTAN codes, their own entrance & run a separate service to the main concourse.

64710679 about 7 years ago

Thanks

64710679 about 7 years ago

Hi
Can I check what a negative height refers to?
way/22925660#map=17/55.85828/-4.25673

Cheers
DaveF

63800817 about 7 years ago

I've reverted both changesets

64742085 about 7 years ago

Hi
Welcome to OSM.
If this department occupies the whole building it would be worth mapping it. You can use adjacent buildings & their tagging as examples.

Cheers
DaveF

63800817 about 7 years ago

Hi
relation/4220153/history

Has all this & surrounding area become residential?

64421224 about 7 years ago

Please don't tag incorrectly to suit the renderer. if it's a kissing gate it needs to be tagged as such. The OSM database is rendered in many different way, some of which show kissing gates.
https://leaflet-extras.github.io/leaflet-providers/preview/

64227458 about 7 years ago

Hi
Welcome to OSM.
Something's gone wrong with your edit. What is it you're trying to achieve?

63609968 about 7 years ago

That maybe the new name of the company, but not the lettering of the signage. You've got ahead of yourself.

63556054 about 7 years ago

Does the tagging, as is, excludes taxis?

63536898 about 7 years ago

Hi
Is there reason you believe the A403 isn't a trunk road?
From the wiki:
Trunk - "primary A road (green signs) "

62793152 over 7 years ago

How can cul-de-sacs be oneway? Please stop fantasy mapping

62793049 over 7 years ago

Hello Welcome to OSM & all that, but this is utter rubbish. Please map responsibly.

59988320 over 7 years ago

Entropy - more items = more maintenance. The "inexperienced" often mistake MP's & add tags to their ways, creating errors in rendering.

I'm struggling to see how drawing & tagging one single polygon way is less work than mapping lots of individual ways, splitting an existing polygon into multiple ways, creating two MP relations, adding them to all the ways & then deleting tags from the existing polygon.

44811485 over 7 years ago

Hi
You've added "dontimport:fhrs:" tagshttp://overpass-turbo.eu/s/BUT. What Is its purpose?
To check, are you aware of the discussions on Talk-GB where it was agreed that only fhrs:id & address data was to be added? Transient info, such as rating, rating date would result in unnecessary maintenance.All other tags were either irrelevant or could be determined by cross referencing with the FHRS database?
osm.wiki/UK_2016_Q4_Project:_Food_Hygiene_Ratings

52955672 over 7 years ago

Hi Paul
Thanks.
There a few others to clear: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/BUM
There's also 'checkfirst' which could do with looking at: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/BUO

Are you aware of the discussions on Talk-GB where it was agreed that only fhrs:id & address data was to be added? Transient info, such as rating, rating date would result in unnecessary maintenance. fhrs:authority is irrelevant as OSM is geospatially aware.
osm.wiki/UK_2016_Q4_Project:_Food_Hygiene_Ratings

52955672 over 7 years ago

What is "dontimport:fhrs:addrline1" used for?

62098852 over 7 years ago

Hi
Welcome to OSM.
Please be aware there should only be one 'railway=station' per railway station. Any buildings should be tagged 'building=train_station'
Please make sure you don't accidentally delete ways (the steps down to the platforms in this case)
Cheers
DaveF

59988320 over 7 years ago

Hi Brian.
Is there a valid reason you split lots of riverbanks into relation members? It makes it so much more difficult to edit.
Can you not just draw a simple polygon for your landuse=farmland additions?
Please note that tag shouldn't be used for whole swathes of land, but individual fields (which rarely adjoin directly with the river)