It's temporarily closed for repair work of the bridge over. While it's closed it's still designated as a public footpath.

Hi KingHelps
All parks = open space provided for recreational use.
All open space provided for recreational use /= parks.
Is it used for recreation?
If you said to any 8 year olds you're taking them to 'the park, & went there, would they be happy or disappointed?
Not conclusive, but a good guide: https://www.bristol.gov.uk/museums-parks-sports-culture/parks-and-open-spaces

Hi Neil
You've split/duplicated the YMCA way/594364550 way/39275886
Was this to add the shops as polygons on Broad St?.

Hi Neil
It also shows Found on the right window.
Video from Sacco's rear window: https://www.instagram.com/p/BiO0h7ZgXPM/

Isn't Sacco hair above Found? https://pbs.twimg.com/media/De7sEgAXkAAwjHo.jpg

Is Gardiner Haskins Homecentre the building's actual name?

Is that an official name? Signpost or an OoC map?

Hi Mike

If a pub is just a building then the tags should be placed on it, but if, as in this case, it also includes a car park & garden or even multiple buildings then it's more accurate to map a boundary polygon around everything owned by the pub. "beer_garden=yes" & "outdoor_seating=yes" are still valid tags. I would map cafes & hotels with similar features in the same way. I wouldn't take wiki pages as gospel; many were written when the likes of pubs were mapped as just a node. With the ability to zoom in further being introduced, it allowed more detail to be added, hence the pub as drawn now. The schema came after buildings were more commonly drawn.

Hi Northisland
FYI where pubs have external land the pub details are tagged on the perimeter boundary. This is similar scheme to schools/hospitals etc.

Excellent, thanks.

Has this entertainment facility closed?

Hi DonalMcL
Welcome to OSM
I'm curious what schema you're using for indoor mapping. Do you have a link?

Should buildingpart be building:part?

way/580417826#map=19/51.37995/-2.32839
This way (& others) appears incomplete & is mapped over an area that isn't a building. Is this correct?

You've created nodes such as this at each corner of a room. Are they required?:
node/5556314447
Instead of tagging the nodes of the room way you've overlaid a separate node. You can test this by dragging the separate node. It doesn't drag the way. I'm pretty sure this is incorrect.

You have two relations with the same name:
way/580417817

You've deleted the building tag from both. Please revert. As you know what they are, is there a reason you can't add their new usage?

I've reverted this Chainset

To check, has the building been demolished?

To check, has the building been demolished?

Hi
Who are 'we'?
'name' id for official titles which are declared on signs or out of copyright maps etc. If there's a name known just locally please use 'loc_name'

Hi
To check, what is the reason for these split ways? The one's I've checked appear to have the same tags as the way they been split from. Except you've somehow removed all route relations.

I have to say I'm a bit confused by your logic. You want a locked gate that has almost certainly never been used & is highly unlikely to be used, as a service road. Yet want one that's in use 24/7 by motor vehicles as pedestrian.
I think I've fixed College Green, but the rendering is V. slow for MPs

Half my edits in one changeset didn't save to the database. I'll let it settle before editing.
Point 3. It's a vehicle entrance to the hotel & adjacent businesses. There's a clear kerb definition with double yellows. When I went past there were parked up taxis. There are loading restriction signs. ESRI has vehicles & Mapillary shows a vehicle pulling in.
Where are the pedestrian signs ocated?