Hi
Is it that shape? Aren't there more than one building?

Hi
It requires a building=* tag instead of landuse.

Hi
The restaurant already exists as a building polygon in OSM

Excellent. Could you correct it please.

Hi
There's already a John Wood House. way/89231070

Is that the block of the student accommodation?

Hi
A detailed household depot already exists. If public can't enter the bit you've just mapped would it better as a separate polygon? Is it for commercial companies?

Your addition also doubles up landuse=industrial.

*Western end

To check:
way/509695171

Doe this bridleway join into a footpath? Unusual if it does.

Actually it is for railways. They're not rendered & should be transferred to Open History Map.

www.openstreetmap.org/way/396051783

If buildings are demolished they should be removed from OSM as it's not a historical map.

I'm confused now. Is or isn't the crescent oneway to vehicles?

You should have "researched" before adding features. You could of done it "sooner" but instead you went on to add further chainsets before being blocked. Your blocks are for a reason. Please try & comprehend why.

I've just added the route over Ashton Bridge. I've tweeted MetroBus to confirm that section's a guided busway: way/509467560

I took the tags from Cambridge except I've kept is a construction for now:
www.openstreetmap.org/way/93272889

Yes, there were duplicates. You've just delete one of them!

Hi
Now oneway:
https://travelwest.info/metrobus/metrobus-build/spike-island

is this link now dug up?:
way/25683723

Is the cycle contraflow painted lines or a segregated lane?

Is this new cycle path open?
way/476337752

Rowland was/is under an acknowledgement ban so unable to message via changeset, but I did receive a DM (although it didn't really address my concerns). It's surprising someone with 7K edits is unaware of MPs & his 'blitzkrieg' mapping technique of not tidying up after himself is *very* annoying.

You've created a duplicate of schools at Noss/North school

Hi
I'm adding NCN4 relation to the new roundabout. Were any cycle lanes included in the construction an were the feeder lanes as short as you've mapped them??

Correction: "it *doesn't* tie in "

In JOSM There's also the newer amenity=social_facility as an umbrella value for all variants as list in the link I provided above, which seems sensible development to me

The two main problems I have with the port is
1) it's tagged as industrial which duplicates existing area
2) it does tie in with what I saw on the ground. The public bridleway to Portishead was definitely outside the fence last time I rode it. (admittedly a few years ago)