OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
49928620 over 8 years ago

Hi
By "too prominent" are you referring to how it renders on the standard map? If so, could you reinstate it please.

If it exists it can be mapped. If you feel the rendering isn't to your liking you can discuss it in the relevant forum: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues.

49674010 over 8 years ago

BTW Welcome to OSM.

I've never found an official name, which is why I never named it. I see it more as a leisure=recreation_ground than a park. It certainly shouldn't be tagged as both.

How about 'Manor Road Playing Fields'? http://sports-facilities.co.uk/sites/view/6001121

49680195 over 8 years ago

Allow me to correct myself. It is in the pub's garden & EH have located it in the wrong place

49680195 over 8 years ago

Hi
Is there a reason you moved The Cove's location?
http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/visit/places/stanton-drew-circles-and-cove/history-and-research/

49674010 over 8 years ago

Hi
Could you provide your source for the name please.

49526098 over 8 years ago

Please refrain from adding not existing features. As noted previously there's a likelihood they'll be removed, which would be a waste of your time. Note comment about historical data: osm.org/welcome.html

49401905 over 8 years ago

Hi
Who did you discuss the addition of historical data to OSM with? Lack of features in other software is not a valid reason to add it to OSM. osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_historic_events_and_historic_features

I've had a brief read of Pleiades. I see no mention of contributing to OSM. It's a bit vague, but they appear to have their own database. Could you contribute to that?

49401905 over 8 years ago

Unsure of OHM's status, but OSM is not the place for razed entities. Please feel free to add any examples that still exist, adding appropriate tags.
Could you also have a look at the problems NDM flagged up. Thanks.

49428345 over 8 years ago

And you are obviously an inexperienced OSM mapper. It is not just for anglers information. Please read up on how to map accurately: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/6/how-do-i-get-started-with-openstreetmap

49428345 over 8 years ago

Have you thought about mapping the actual fishing sites instead of the irrelevant 'access' notes?

49401905 over 8 years ago

Hi Syvanne
Welcome to OSM could you clarify what it is your trying to add?
Most visible extents of the mediaeval wall are mapped.
OSM is a database of current entities. If you wish to record historical data I recommend having a read of this: osm.wiki/Open_Historical_Map

49206152 over 8 years ago

FYI area tag isn't required for man_made=bridge

49055920 over 8 years ago

Hi Mike
This appears misplaced.

49054597 over 8 years ago

Hi

note/1012159

49048118 over 8 years ago

OK.
Are the grounds for the sole use of Sheldon or shared with Hardenhuish?

49048118 over 8 years ago

Hi ~Jack
Other than being 'temporary' is there a reason for the pitch deletions? These are allowed as they're seasonal & return in Autumn. If there's a cricket pitch that can be mapped so it overlaps other pitches:
osm.org/#map=18/51.42953/-2.19274

Is this a public recreation ground or part of the adjacent school?

48790591 over 8 years ago

Hi
You're not sounding rude.

You've changed multiple items from tags that represent farms to tags that do not represent farms, purely to, by your own admission, "get the farm’s name on the map rendering". This absolutely is 'tagging for the renderer'.

Although landuse=farm isn't fully accurate, it's better than place=farm which is not a farm.
To remove landuse=farm from the database (which is the intention of these edits) it would be more accurate to replace nodes with this tag to landuse=farmyard, which is what the vast majority of these are, even though they're nodes not polygons.

48790591 over 8 years ago

Hi
"to get at least the farm’s name on the map rendering," < This is tagging for the render & is to be discouraged. Mapnik carto is just one of many renderings.

By changing from landuse=farm to place=farm you made the OSM database more inaccurate - you made a tag which represents a farm to something which isn't a farm.

If you "have no means to decide whether it’s still a real farmyard" then you should not have made the amendments en bloc.

Is there a wiki page explaining the 'NoFarm' clear up?

48790591 over 8 years ago

Note the description for place=farm: osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Farm&oldid=1459338

This is the rare (non existent in the UK?) where a place such as a village or hamlet of residential houses unrelated to the farm has taken the name of the farm. Ithink you should have tagged it (& others?) as landuse=farmyard

48790591 over 8 years ago

Hi
node/4557760230/history#map=18/50.64972/-2.04102

Could you explain why you made this amendment? It looks like a farmyard to me.