OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
96553132 over 4 years ago

If you're so concerned about it, why didn't you create a MP relation?

104739007 over 4 years ago

Hi
You've no joined the park ways correctly meaning it doesn't render.

104739007 over 4 years ago

Hi
Why have you split the park, pitch & wood into MP relations, yet adding no other relations to the ways? Doing so adds no value to the data.
Please don't used amenity_1. If it's a cricket pavilion, add kindergarten as a node.

104564866 over 4 years ago

I've amended it to be more accurate.

104599302 over 4 years ago

Hi
All main railway=stations are tagged as nodes. This is a duplication
way/942378018#map=18/51.51656/-0.26745
Converted to building=train_station

104526295 over 4 years ago

Thanks for replying.
Please treat all iD validation warnings with an air of caution. Many are dubious in accuracy. All warnings are ignorable.

In your example you've mapped it accurately AFAIC. iD & many routers have a problem navigating over polygon areas

Other poor warnings is adding public_transport tags to railway stations & platforms that aren't public transport such as tourist heritage lines.

104564866 over 4 years ago

way/942150934#map=19/51.38470/-2.37823

Are you /really/ sure?
Bearing in mind the path is blocked at Windsor & Destructor bridges & the height difference is this:
https://snipboard.io/dvjlRq.jpg

97867214 over 4 years ago

Thanks for replying.
Please treat all iD validation warnings with an air of caution. Many are dubious in accuracy. All warnings are ignorable.

In your example it doesn't issue the warning if it's connected to an adjacent highway.
Note if you create a platform from scratch iD doesn't ask you to add highway=footway.

Other poor warnings is adding public_transport tags to railway stations & platforms that aren't public transport such as tourist heritage lines.

104010929 over 4 years ago

Hi
When you add more railway=platforms mapped as polygons could you include the area=yes tag please.

104526295 over 4 years ago

Hi
There is no need to add any highway tags to railway platforms as their raison d'etre is to be walked on.

97867214 over 4 years ago

Hi
There is no need to add any highway tags to railway platforms as their raison d'etre is to be walked on.

way/897770582

96461188 over 4 years ago

...and are you sure it drosses the tracks?

96461188 over 4 years ago

Hi
way/888690610
What is this?
is it a road or platform?
If it's in a sidings yard it certainly isn't public transport.

99322886 over 4 years ago

Hi
There is no need to add any highway tags to railway platforms as their raison d'etre is to be walked on.

way/246778366

102831433 over 4 years ago

way/193979228/history
Hi
There is no need to add any highway tags to railway platforms as their raison d'etre is to be walked on.

90993003 over 4 years ago

Split residential areas around railways
way/142716923

94859869 over 4 years ago

Hi
There is no need to add any highway tags to railway platforms as their raison d'etre is to be walked on.

97247133 over 4 years ago

Hi
Could you reinstate NCN 4 relation please

way/893927558#map=18/51.41362/-0.30687

96866467 over 4 years ago

Hi
Could you reinstate NCN 4 relation please.
way/891716769#map=17/51.39425/-0.41857

97244348 over 4 years ago

Hi
Could you please reinstate NCN 4 relation.
way/893915272#map=17/51.43732/-0.61472

Did you mean to add a bridge tag?
way/893915273