OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
81542888 almost 6 years ago

Hi
It becomes "complex" if tags are duplicated in irrelevant locations.
You added a stop area relation. Therefore any routing software will be able to find the ref:crs on the station node.
Adding duplicating data only leads to confusion & errors.
One station = one station code.

Please add railway=stop + the relevant NapTAN stop position codes to enable accurate routing.

72281378 almost 6 years ago

Those are all railway codes. Why have you added it to a bus stop (that's nowhere near a railway)? Are you reading old data for the station on the former line that is now a busway?

72281378 almost 6 years ago

Hi again
Where did you obtain the ref:crs tag from?

72281378 almost 6 years ago

Hi
Where did you obtain the ref:CRS tag from?

72281378 almost 6 years ago

Hi
What has Network Rail data to do with bus stops?

56769615 almost 6 years ago

Great, thanks.

28910229 almost 6 years ago

Has this building been removed?

81542888 almost 6 years ago

Adding superfluous ref:crs tags "skews the data" . In this instance - for the router.

80578022 almost 6 years ago

Cheers

79369743 almost 6 years ago

Hi
Amenity=park is incorrect. but what is it?

78338301 almost 6 years ago

highway=ford is deprecated for ford=yes

node/7052051329

80578022 almost 6 years ago

node/7187240576#map=18/54.06513/-2.16555

highway=ford is deprecated for ford=yes

77371109 almost 6 years ago

Ta

81051746 almost 6 years ago

Great. Thanks

81542888 almost 6 years ago

osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

81542888 almost 6 years ago

Hi
I think railway=stop + the relevant NapTAN stop position code is what should be added.
osm.wiki/NaPTAN#NaPTAN

The correct term is tagging *incorrectly* to suit the renderer. Positioning nodes so valid data can display isn't incorrect.See village place names as an example. It's a bit awkward because the platforms are askew but somewhere half way between the two on railway land is fine for the station node.

81051746 almost 6 years ago

Hi
As you've deleted the bridge over Kingham Station how do passengers get to the opposite platform?
Are you sure the footpath here no longer exists?osm.org/go/eunyG79Mw--?m=

81562556 almost 6 years ago

Hi Mark
Why have you deleted this landuse polygon?
If it's owned/used by a railway company for 'railway' purposes then it's a valid addition to OSM.
if the area demarcated is inaccurate then it should be amended, not removed.

81542888 almost 6 years ago

Hi Brian
There should only be one ref:crs per station & it should be on the railway=station node.
It's best to position that node away from the station building to allow its name & other facilities to render & display.

73960971 almost 6 years ago

If you spot any of my errors, let me know & I'll fix them.

The node in the channel is still there.