OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
161733647 11 months ago

Hi
The relocated station is not open yet.

To check, what announcement has been made that the the new station is opening when the rail line re-opens?

Could you provide a link?

156443692 12 months ago

Hi
What is the source for the ref:crs tag in this edit?

152533518 12 months ago

Why have you removed the highway tag?
Why have you added 'was:highway'?

161354690 12 months ago

Hi
Why isn't this station a preserved railway?

161357877 12 months ago

Hi
All railway stations are already mapped.
way/227167460/history

139450408 12 months ago

Do not remove valid wikipedia tags. This is vandalism.

160961278 12 months ago

Not having an end node at that location shouldn't make any difference to routing software. If it's a requirement of the software then it was poorly coded.
T-junctions " directing traffic in separate directions." but no one splits a way at that location.

Leaving a flare as one continuous way still satisfies the wiki statement of "the road is split into two one-directional roads".
The flare is /still/ split into two one way roads.

160961278 12 months ago

These edits make not improvement to the OSM database. It just fragments entities making them more laborious to edit.

The #SharpTurns /still/ remain!

160785535 about 1 year ago

Reverting as this goes against the wiki. An unprotected, non-separate cycle lane should be defined as a lane on the road.

160654778 about 1 year ago

1. Raise an issue with the developers.
2. Stop using Relatify.

160611324 about 1 year ago

Hi
I primarily based my amendments on this post:
https://www.instagram.com/p/DDy4MpgCXWq/

Open only a week, including Christmas. No signs of stalls. Where's the vending machine? Where has Maureen's located during the repairs? I never noticed it when walking through.

The huts are due to return at sometime. Retaining them as disused for the moment as the history of an entity is beneficial.

Reverting back from a way to a node doesn't really improve the OSM database. I wouldn't take any validation software as carte blanche to amend items. If they're overlapping the best solution is to amend them so they don't.

160656701 about 1 year ago

You done it again, in multiple areas.
way/1346491652

Without a valid response, I'll consider this erroneous & revert your changesets.

160654778 about 1 year ago

Hi
Why are you splitting these roads?
way/1346459768

156248258 about 1 year ago

Hi
The network is Glasgow Subway.
The operator is SPT.
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/29751009

160581198 about 1 year ago

Hi
way/1346017210

As the cycle lane is unprotected it is already tagged on the roadway as 'cycleway=opposite_lane'

way/167283

157608564 about 1 year ago

Hi
please refrain from removing tags of railway stations.

160276769 about 1 year ago

Hi
User mstrbrid has made amendments to you cycle lane additions which I'm not sure are correct. You probably have more on ground knowledge than me so you may wish to verify.
changeset/

160443713 about 1 year ago

Why have you removed this stretch of cycle lane?
https://maps.app.goo.gl/dmx4v6cmQUxzg9pf6

160443713 about 1 year ago

Hi
Has this stretch of painted cycle lane been removed?
https://maps.app.goo.gl/ZY5EY4PQyR75RwAV8

160264732 about 1 year ago

Just because Maproulette suggest you change something it doesn't mean it should.
As I said, post your edit there is *still* " a sharp turn in a highway".
It brings no benefits to the OSM database.
Please refrain from making these types of edits.