DanGlover's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 130958398 | almost 3 years ago | Are these three boxes not in RG40 rather than GU40? |
| 129525472 | about 3 years ago | Hi fitzsimons - is the post box definitely CV45 236? That would be a new postal district but this area was within CV47 Dan |
| 119874916 | over 3 years ago | Hi Yorvik Prestigitator - I checked this location back in April 2021, the K6 is still present but the post box and its brick pillar are gone (replacement box opposite Elmwood Close, just east). I can double-check at some point if you have more recent information but 99% convinced it had gone... (This reminds me, I had a plan to add Historic England references to the K6s in the area.) Dan |
| 119503276 | over 3 years ago | Hi LivingWithDragons...a query on post box LA1 6. node/3930655564 has this in the wall on the southern side (RBS?) but your Changeset has created 9653752065 on the northern side at NatWest. Has the box moved, please? Thanks, Dan |
| 97451681 | about 4 years ago | Excellent. Thanks very much. |
| 106360432 | over 4 years ago | Hi Stephen - It's me again with another post box query. I see CF35 13 is in a new build area but Royal Mail lists as CF35 11 - they may have fitted the wrong plate though. RM has CF35 13 at Brocastle Manor (just off A48 near Corntown, if you're ever down that way and want to map some more new build) Dan |
| 105915230 | over 4 years ago | Hi Alex - sorry, one more which came out via Robert Whittaker's reference checks https://osm.mathmos.net/postboxes/osm-ref-issues.html Here I think it's RG8 again but perhaps the suffix is D rather than U? (I must also learn about how Notes and StreetComplete work together) Regards, Dan |
| 105988211 | over 4 years ago | Hi Mapper 8 - the post box reference here is in a strange format so possibly a mis-type, but the expected value is BB9 175. RM have been known to make mistakes though. Are you able to confirm, please? Regards, Dan |
| 105920437 | over 4 years ago | Hi Alex - also this one would be expected as RG8 454. Regards, Dan |
| 105915228 | over 4 years ago | Hi Alex - Other information suggests the post box at the station should be RG8 62 (but RM do make mistakes). Are you able to check at some point, please? Regards, Dan |
| 105885343 | over 4 years ago | Hi St Mary Clay - other information has the post box as BR7 461 (but RM do make mistakes) - are you able to double-check at some point, please? Regards, Dan |
| 105759044 | over 4 years ago | Hi Rob - other information suggests the post box at the station is (or was) DT9 3, box 33 is elsewhere and mapped by you a while ago. Do you have notes or a photo to confirm the reference, possibly? Regards, Dan |
| 106227770 | over 4 years ago | Hi JodaStephen - the post box in node/8825816223 appears to have the same details as node/8827140471 about 80 m north. Are there two with the same reference? Regards, Dan |
| 105581786 | over 4 years ago | Hi skifans - you've entered reference HS3 154 for the post box but HG3 154 would be expected here. Sometimes Royal Mail get the labels wrong but are you able to confirm, please? Dan |
| 104782599 | over 4 years ago | Peter - I'll let you sort it out as and when. While there, would you be able to check the references, please? At the moment it's HA1 1001 on both sides but RM data suggests one should be HA1 100. Dan |
| 104782599 | over 4 years ago | Hi Peter - RM show this as 19:00/13:15 but you've entered 09:00/13:15 which is an unlikely combination. Not sure whether StreetComplete allows you to update though? Dan |
| 103947097 | over 4 years ago | Hi - RM data suggests there should be two boxes here, one double N1 59/159) and one meter/parcels (N1 61). Has one box been removed? |
| 102689811 | over 4 years ago | Thanks! 105 is as expected. A few others in KT6 if you ever run out of things to do...https://osm.mathmos.net/postboxes/progress/KT/KT6/ |
| 102689811 | over 4 years ago | Hi hocu - I see you've added the Post Box reference via StreetComplete but the number 740740 doesn't match the expected value in RM records and is very much longer than the usual format for box numbers. Is this maybe a glitch with StreetComplete? Are you able to check the box again, please? |
| 102463649 | over 4 years ago | Hi CalumM - Post box 119 should be the one further south at the Post Office - but it's possible it has been labelled wrongly. Also does it not show the district (PH13 ?) on the label? |