way/15309013

The height limit is simply wrong!

Where do you live? Are you physically in the US? What kind of terrible data source was being used here?

way/15309013/history/

Yeah, you did change swimming pools to building, must be very smart I guess.

way/1125823351#map=19/39.523240/-75.817002

I don’t need data source in PA, I’m the source because I drove there before.

Wiki can be edited by anyone, I don’t agree with it.

Having two lanes != road is not one way, so technically speaking if I want to say it is one lane and not one way, that’s also correct.

For Austin Trl near Eagle Rd: way/1347398441/history#map=19/41.188342/-76.460292

Sometimes an exception can be given by not (cutting the segment into two & explicitly mark that tiny part near the intersection as no markings), reason is because of the proximity to the intersection for turning. In urban areas you also won't see lane markings full applied when it is close to the intersection (often stop at the "stop line").

The road here has markings.

way/12005895#map=16/41.18640/-76.31453

Well...you should not resolve any warning (from iD editor) by just applying its suggested fix (which is likely what you did there), because in this case you apparently added a ford and the reality does not agree with it.

However, there is also a chance that the bridge was recently installed, I do not have any prior information but this preserve is indeed having some projects down to the valley.

Do you have any idea of what your team was doing here?

changeset/154244957#map=19/40.030709/-75.153877

You added a conditional restriction to a node, this node could be a part of the relation nearby, or could be not, how could others interpret?

Why don't you add that condition to the relation?

Why this bridge has different classification than others nearby?

way/1326405935#map=19/41.216040/-76.432432

If there is no marking, even if the road is two way, you should still not map lanes and assume “2”.

We do not map “assumptions”, I understand your logic but tagging the road “no marking” is enough, mapping lanes and specify how many each direction has, is overegg the pudding.

You are right.

So “lanes” should not be added then.

Any valid reason to spam dog/cat/horse whatever animal access on the sidewalk? I think canada geese as well as black bear are also good here.

Is there any legal sign saying "yes" to them?

way/1206750316#map=17/41.050978/-76.220473

You should not tag stop sign NOT on the road, this is quite confusing and dangerous.

node/11148968986#map=19/41.051516/-76.223625

highway=stop

highway=stop

Read this if you want to map stop signs, I'm not sure what you were trying to describe as there is no point to make.

node/94070691#map=19/41.052118/-76.224046

Leave your company's garbage at your internal place rather than putting it at OSM. alt_name is quite controversial when the street has an official name assigned by the local authority.

way/17506686/history#map=18/41.052769/-76.231315

Please do not use Bing to edit PA. Just take a look at your sidewalk and it makes everyone uncomfortable.

way/1202529864/history#map=18/41.052129/-76.228965