source + aerial imagery and local knowledge

Laipni lūdzam OSM!/Добро пожаловать в OSM!
Vai var paskaidrot, kas šeit bija cerēts izdarīt?

*русских

О, я недавно тут правил и не смог официальное название на латышском найти, поэтому не менял. Только почему в латышском названии есть упоминание поморской общины, а в русской нет?

Hello, it seems like this business has been recently closed, is that right?

Many thanks for helping me add new features in Daugavpils!

I see that you are using Maxar imagery, likely without an offset. Unfortunately, this imagery is a bit misaligned, about (1, 3.5)m in Daugavpils. I'm using Esri imagery (almost the same as Latvia - Ortophoto in JOSM) without an offset. Esri also aligns good against Mapillary imagery, which is available in most parts of the city.
It is, however, a bit out-of-date, Maxar is better in this case (some features of recent years are visible only there, not on Esri) and in the case of drawing building contours.

These changes were made using StreetComplete app. It does not provide options for manual changeset splits. Instead, it opens a changeset for each quest (question) type and collects all answers there for some time period (surveying).
So in this case better advice could be not to complete quests from different parts of the world in one session. Only after some time (several hours?) the changeset is closed and uploaded. Answering questions somewhere else would then create a new changeset without greatly expanding bounding box of the previous one.

Дороги, использующиеся для проезда на территории следует отмечать тэгом highway=service. highway=track используется для небольших сельскохозяйственных дорог/неофициальных грунтовок.
Аналогичный вопрос по поводу удалённой дороги, как и в другой правке.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98138997

Почему были удалены дороги, которые видны на аэрофотоснимках и на снимках с земли (https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/W6aA9uXanAH8eBVjSgkggE, https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ocCaqldH-D75CN6JNMj12A)?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98139046

Vai runa iet par veloceļiņu relation tipa objektiem?

Kāpēc tiek dzēsti papildinājumi no manis un Aldis Smans - osm.org/#map=19/55.89631/26.60834, osm.org/#map=19/55.86962/26.51262 (ceļiņi parka ieejā, parka ceļiņa tracing), osm.org/#map=19/55.86727/26.51391 (dzēstas kāpnes, ceļiņu tracing)?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94937581

Salabots ar changeset/95070919

Uhm, this is rendering not as I've planned. Maybe splitting the forest is the better option...

Changed from steles to war memorials, as it is their primary task. Can be changed back to steles or be used as multivalue.
The inscriptions for bigger steles, unfortunately, exceed the limit of 255 characters, so I left the URL with all texts. Can be transformed to Wikidata objects with inscription key.

Please see changeset/90128911 and https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/Nbhc3DVk8GQrZfC2t7CaTu
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90311470

Это неверное смещение парковки, старое было правильным. Причина в том, что спутниковые снимки Bing имеют небольшой сдвиг и изначально координаты точки карты OSM и её отображение на этих спутниковых картах не совпадают.
В этом плане лучше спутниковые снимки Esri - поставьте их и убедитесь, что ваши правки по сдвигам были откачены как раз к этим снимкам.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89556194

Добро пожаловать на OpenStreetMap, некоммерческий проект по созданию открытой карты мира!
Пожалуйста, не вносите изменения, основываясь на данных Google, в особенности Google Maps. Политика использования данных Google противоречит принципам открытых карт OSM. В этом смысле самый достоверный источник - это Ваши наблюдения непосредственно на месте.

This shifting of bridge is somewhat incorrect, as it relies on satellite imagery and not real gps data. You can verify it by enabling Mapillary imagery in Map data panel - your tracks appear now as partially "hanging" above water. You can see that this bridge is straight, whereas you've introduced some kind of turn here. The problem here is that Maxar imagery isn't always correctly offsetted, you can even see some tiling artifact at the north end of the bridge - the parts of road are not correctly connected. Esri imagery with default offset is much better in this case. You can see that your Mapillary images align pretty good with these satellite images and error is not more than 1m, can be explained with GPS inaccuracy
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89135597

The building itself isn't named Latvijas Ģeotelpiskās informācijas aģentūra (LĢIA), it's LĢIA, which resides in this building -> 2 features are required - area for house and point for LĢIA with the same address
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89167382

For tagging rows of garages building=garages should be used. building=garage is used to tag single-user garage
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89137689