grazie!

Ciao, quando salvi una modifica per favore aggiungi un breve commento; "aggiunti nomi vie" qua poteva andare bene.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Grazie

Hi there, "Mailand: Cornaredo" doesn't really tell much about your edit.
Could you please use proper changeset comments?
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Thanks

Seems like road section was tagged as access=private by another amazon guy few days ago, as per changeset way/685540504/history
If this one's private, the other two roads crossing it should be tagged as private as well.
Generally speaking, I think amazon guys do a nice job adding service roads, but they almost every time ignore access restrictions, which should be added to those service roads instead, as 99% of the times, those roads are private, and can deceive navigators and other map users.
Thanks!

Hi, may bad, note I was referring to is this one
note/1824555
Thanks!

Ciao, grazie per la modifica!
Riguardo l'Atelier Vania, riesci per favore, come deciso dalla community, a spostare l'indirizzo su un nodo singolo, in corrispondenza della posizione della targhetta del civico?
Come questo per fare un esempio node/5204948024
Inoltre, se l'Atelier non occupa tutto l'edificio, converrebbe aggiungere il negozio come un singolo nodo, non dare a tutto l'edificio quel nome.
Grazie, ciao!

Hi there, do all those water area really exist?
I suspect this is a pokemon go related edit, please note, this is not allowed.
Make sure you stick to those basic rules osm.wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

Hi there, welcome to OSM!
I've noticed you've been adding a lot of objects to our map in the last couple of days.
Please slow down a bit and make sure you do things the right way.
You've been adding a lot of names, but you have to understand that not every object deserves a name. You would name "White house" the White House, but you wouldn't name "House" every house of the map, "tree" every tree, "Church" every curch and so on.
Here you added a church named Baptist, but I'm pretty sure it's name is not "Baptist".
Tags are there for a reason, if you want to say that a building is a church you have to use the right tag (building=church), if you want to say that a church is run by Baptists, you should use denomination=Baptist tag and so on.
Same works for this one way/700270064 , if you want to say it's a dog park you should tag is as a leisure=dog_park. Now that one looks like a park, named "Dog Park".
Look at this map osm.org/#map=16/37.5615/-121.9947&layers=N and please adjust what's been pointed out by those red notes. Please make sure you also add a comment to those notes.
Should you need any tips, please reply here!
Thanks!

Concordo, la classificazione avviene in base a precise caratteristiche, non è spannometrica e personale.
osm.wiki/IT:Key:highway#Highway_.28strade_e_vie.29
Ho notato una tua modifica a Tirano, SO, con la stessa trasformazione secondary>residential

Grazie!

grazie!

Hi there Melannial, welcome to OSM and thanks for your map edit!
I've just stumbled upon this note note/1827342 and would like to give you a quick tip about.
I've noticed you added the trail as multiple standalone sections:
note/1827342
way/700237054
way/700237053
and some more.

In order to make things easier, you should have been drawing just one section. Drawing multiple sections is a method only used when those sections need to be tagged with different values, which happens (as an example) when a section is paved, the next one is unpaved or so.
If you like, please try merge all those short ways, otherwise I could help doing that.
Thanks

ottimo, grazie!

Good afternoon, could you please look at this note note/182455 , which is about one of your edits?
thanks

ciao, grazie per la risposta.
Non ho modo di controllare cosa dica la segnaletica escursionistica in zona (ammesso che ci sia), però ti chiederei di togliere il tag source a questo punto, perché leggendo la mappa adesso risulta Cantarso e come fonte la CTR, che però indica Cantardo.
Grazie!

Ciao, giusto per curiosità, qual è la tua fonte per questo cambio di nome?
la carta tecnica regionale lo indica come "Monte Cantardo"
Grazie

Ciao, io suggerirei di scrivere una mail a osm.wiki/Data_working_group , chiedendo il loro intervento.

great, thanks!

Hi there, I've noticed you've been adding quite a good amount of highway=give_way and highway=stop, please make sure you also add the direction=forward/backward tag, as suggested by the wiki
highway=give way

Thanks!

yeah, exactly. Best practice usually implies moving a node and placing to a more accurate location; deleting the old one and creating a new one sometimes is cause of data loss, therefore it's discouraged.
I've had a look at the old water point location and also at the new one. Distance between the two of them is about 3 to 4 meters, not much, at all.
Anyway, thanks for supporting OSM project!
cheers